Developing and Piloting a Literature Course Learnable Via Blackboard for EFL Literature Instruction
The underlying purpose for this study was to describe how technology was used to teach a literature course developed by the researchers in an EFL context and to explore the effects of the online course on students’ achievement via piloting the new course and to further gain information about the skills and reactions of students who used this new literature course while employing technology in their learning. The researchers, therefore, set to employ a qualitative/quantitative approach to describe how technology was harnessed to deliver the newly piloted literature in an EFL class and explore students’ reactions to the use of technology in the EFL context. Purposeful sampling was used in selecting 30 participants for the study from Saudi students studying English as a foreign language. The features and facilities of Blackboard were fully used in the course of the study. Two semi-structured surveys were conducted with each participant, among teachers and students, during initial and final instruction weeks. As such, students’ perceptions of the use of technology in the teaching of literature in the EFL classroom were assessed. Findings of the study showed the effectiveness of the Modern Literary Movements course delivered online, called the online Literature course hence forth. Qualitative and quantitative findings also showed that learning outcomes are in alignment with the course requirements, and that course assessments are in agreement with the course content and learning objectives, assignments and evaluation procedures, and the professional presentation of the e-course on the part of the course instructors. Results also proved that the course could prove effective in enhancing the participants’ performance on pretesting compared to post testing results. The study ends on notes of recommendation and implications for further research.
Anderson, R. & B. Speck. (2001). Using technology in K-8 literacy classrooms. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Belz, J. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y. P., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L. … Euang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research. Fall, 74(1), 379-439.
Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to English language assessment (1st ed.). ISBN: 9780072948363. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. P. 144
Case, C., & Truscott, D. M. (1999). The lure of bells and whistles: Choosing the best software to support reading instruction. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15, 361-369.
Chen, C. N., Chen, S. C., Chen, S. H. E., & Wey, S. C. (2013). The effects of extensive reading via e-books on tertiary level efl students’ reading attitude, reading comprehension and vocabulary. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 303-312.
Crutsinger, C., Knight, D., & Kinley, T. (2005). Learning style preferences: Implications for web-based instruction. Cloth Textiles Research Journal, 23(1), 266-277.
Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (1995). Multiculturalism and learning style: Teaching and counselling adolescents. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Ehrmann, S. C. (2002). Improving the Outcomes of Education: Learning from Past Mistakes. Educause Review, 37(1). http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0208.pdf
Fageeh, A., & Mekheimer, M. (2013). Effects of blackboard on EFL academic writing and attitudes. The JALTCALL Journal, 9(2), 169-196.
Filimban, G. Z. (2008). Factors that contribute to the effectiveness of online learning technology at Oregon State University. Thesis (Ph. D.): Oregon State University.
Gareis, E. (1997). Literature and film adaptations: Dealing with hot topics in the ESL and literacy classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(3), 220-222.
Gareis, E., Allard, M., & Saindon, J. (2009).The novel as textbook. TESL Canada Journal, 26(2), 136-147.
Gilmore, S., & Warren, S. (2007). Emotion online: Experiences of teaching in a virtual learning environment. Human Relationship, 60, 581-608.
Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and performance on listening comprehension stimuli. Language Testing, 19(2), 133-167.
Harasim, L. M. (Ed.). (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (pp.189-211).
Hellebrandt, J. (1999). Virtual collaborations in the Spanish class: From e-mail to web design and CDROM development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(1), 59-70.
Hicks, M., Reid, I., & George, R. (2001). Enhancing online teaching: Designing responsive learning environments. The International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 143-151.
Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des langues vivantes, 61(3), 355-382.
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207-223.
Huang, H., Chern, C., & Lin, C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52, 13–26.
Irons, L.R., Keel, R., & Bielema, C. L. (2002). Blended learning and learner satisfaction: Keys to user acceptance? USDLA. J., 16, 29-39.
Jelfs, A., & Whitelock, D. (2000).The notion of presence in virtual learning environments: What makes the environment “real”? British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(2), 145-152.
Kay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 529-536.
Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.
Lebel, T., Olshtain, E., & Weiss, P. L. (2005). Teaching teachers about augmentative and alternative communication: Opportunities and challenges of a web-based course. Augmentative Alternative Communication, 21, 264-277.
Lynch, M. (2001). Effective student preparation for online learning. Retrieved online from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=901.
MacDonald, J., & McAteer, E. (2003). New approaches to supporting students: Strategies for blended learning in distance and campus based environments. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 129-45.
Mansoor, I. (2002). The REEP program perspective: The benefits & challenges of technology. Uses of Technology in Adult ESL Education. Washington, DC: National Centre for ESL Literacy Education (NCLE).
Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire M., & Vagge S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communications by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 638-643.
Moore, G. M. & Thompson, M. (1997). The effects of distance learning. University Park, PA: Penn State’s American Centre for the Study of Distance Education.
Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., Upchurch,R., Hartman, J., & Truman, B. (2006). Assessing online learning: What one university learned about student success, persistence and satisfaction. Peer Review, 8(1), 26-29.
Newsome, W. (2008). An investigation of efficiency and preference of supplemental learning modules in online instruction (Unpublished maser’s thesis). Reno: The University of Nevada.
O’Toole, J. M., & Absalom, D. J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two?. Journal of Educational Media, 28(1), 179-91.
Oh, C. (2003). Information communication technology and the new university: A view on eLearning. ANNALS of American Academy of Political Social Science, 58(5), 134-153.
Pellicer-Sanchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do Things Fall Apart?. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 31-55.
Poole, J. (2006). E-learning and learning styles: Students’ reactions to web-based language and style at Blackpool and the Fylde college. Language Literate Journal, 15, 307-320.
Sarica, G., & Cavus, N. (2008, May 6-9). Web-based English language learning. Paper presented at the 8th International Educational Technology Conference, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Smith, D. R., & Ayers, D. F. (2006). Culturally responsive pedagogy and online learning: Implications for the globalized community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30, 401-415.
Stokes, C., C. Cannavina, & Cannavina, G. (2004). The state of readiness of student health professionals for web-based learning environments. Health Information Journal, 10(2), 195-203.
Stubbs, M., & Martin, I. (2003). Blended learning: One small step. Learning and Teaching in Action, 2(3), 35-50.
Sun, Y. C. (2003). Extensive reading online: An overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 438-446.
Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. L., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. M. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 93-135.
Tham, C., & Werner, J. (2005). Designing and evaluating e-learning in higher education: A review and recommendations. Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies, 11(1), 15-25.
Usun, S., & Kömür, S. (2009). Marketing of distance learning in ELT programs: The challenges for marketing distance education in online environment. Online Submission.
Voos, R. (2003). Blended learning: What is it and where might it take us? Sloan-C View, 2(1), 2-5.
Wang, Y. (2004). English magazines, motivation, and improved EFL writing skill. English Teaching Forum, 42(1), 24-29.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face to face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(1), 7-26.
Wegner, S. B., Holloway, K. C., & Garton, E. M. (1999). The effects of Internet-based instruction on student learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(1), 98-106.
Wegner, S. B., Holloway, A., Ken, C., & Garton, E. M. (1999). The effects of Internet-based instruction on student learning. JALN, 3(2), 98-106.
Yang, S., & Chen, Y. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 860-879.
Zaid, M. (1999). Context and relevance theory in language teaching: an exploratory approach. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 37(2), 111-126.
- There are currently no refbacks.
How to do online submission to another Journal?
If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
E-mail: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com