A Critical Review of Ferdinand de Saussure’s Linguistic Theory
Needless to say that the issues and problems by previous linguistic studies and theories have not been completely resolved yet and still remain in dispute. Therefore the authors of this paper feel the need for the re-examination of those problems and principles studied and discussed many years ago. And because the authors believe that many of these problems in linguistics were recognized by Ferdinand de Saussure, the attempt has been made to support this by presenting his linguistic considerations and discussions. The authors’ selection of de Saussure can be justified by the tremendous influence of his work in general development of linguistic theories.
The study has revealed that Saussure’s vision of complexities and dilemmas in the description of language still persists in linguistics. For example, uncertainty and disputes still exist over the relation of language to the very great number of speech events in the experience of linguists, in addition to the status of rules or laws applying to all languages and in addition to the nature of linguistic units, especially in semantics. Thus, the study reveals that Saussure’s deliberations provide an inspiring impetus for reconsidering the still disputed aspects and areas in linguistics.
Bloomfield, L. (1972). Literate and illiterate speech. American Speech, 2, 432-9.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cobley, Paul, & Jansz, L. (1999). Introducing semiotics. Cambridge: Icon.
Chomsky, N. (1961). Some methodological remarks on generative Grammar. Word, 17, 219-39.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
De Beaugrande, R. (1993). Linguistic theory: The discourse of fundamental works. Second Impression. London: Langman Group UK Limited.
De Saussure, F. (1966). B. Wade Trans.. Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. London: Oxford.
Firth, J. R. (1968). F. R. Palmer (Ed.). Selected papers of J. R. Firth 1952-1959. London: Longmans.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). The users and uses of language. In M. A. K. Halliday, A. McIntosh, & Strevens (Eds.), The linguistic sciences and language teaching, (Ch.4, pp.75-110). London: Longmans.
Harris, R. (1983). Ferdinand de Saussure: Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.
Harris, R. (1987). Reading Saussure: A critical commentary on the “Course de Linguistique Générale”. London: Duckworth.
Harris, R. (2001). Saussure and his interpreters. Edingburgh: Edingburgh University Press.
Holdcraft, D. (1991). Saussure: Signs, systems and arbitrariness. Cambridge: Cup.
Robins, R. H. (1993). General linguistics: An introductory survey. Third impression. London: Longman Group Limited.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tagai, M. (2009). Ferdinand de Saussure: An isolated linguist’s impossible “A Course in general linguistics”. Tokyo: Sakuhinsha.
Thibault, P. J. (1997). Re-reading Saussure: The Dynamics of signs in social life. London: Routledge.
- There are currently no refbacks.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
E-mail: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com