Students’ Achievement and Attitudes Toward Using Traditional Learning, Blended Learning, and Virtual Classes Learning in Teaching and Learning at the University Level

Mohammad A. Alseweed

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the effects of the traditional learning, blended learning and virtual classes learning on university students’ achievement and attitudes. 34 male students studying at the English Language Program, Qassim University were divided randomly into three groups, (blended learning, traditional learning, or virtual classes learning). Results indicate that there are significant differences among the instructional approaches in the achievement test scores in favor of blended learning. In addition, the results show significant differences in students’ attitudes in favor of blended learning.

Key words: Blended learning; Traditional learning; Virtual classes learning; Saudi students’ achievement; Attitudes; E-learning


Keywords


Blended learning; Traditional learning; Virtual classes learning; Saudi students’ achievement; Attitudes; E-learning

References


Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Wade, A., Schmid, R., Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., Lowerison, G., Zhang, D., Nicolaidou, I., Newman, S., Wozney, L., & Peretiatkowicz, A. (2008). A Review of E-Learning in Canada: A Rough Sketch of the Evidence, Gaps and Promising Directions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne De L’Apprentissage Et De La Technologie, 32(3). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/27

Adas, Daba & Abu Shmais, Wafa (2011). Students’ Perceptions Towards Blended Learning Environment Using the OCC. An - Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities), 25(6), 1681-1710. Retrieved from http://scholar.najah.edu/sites/scholar.najah.edu/files/journal-article/students039-perceptions-towards-blended-learning-environment-using-occ.pdf

Akkoyunlu, Buket & Soylu, Meryem Yilmaz (2008). A Study of Student’s Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193. Retrieved from http://ifets.info/journals/11_1/13.pdf

Alavi, M., & Gallupe, R. B. (2003). Using Information Technology in Learning: Case Studies in Business and Management Education Programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(2), 139-154.

Al-Saai, Ahmad, Aisha Al-Kaabi, & Sarah Al-Muftah (2011). Effect of a Blended E-Learning Environment on Students’ Achievement and Attitudes Toward Using E-Learning in Teaching and Learning at the University Level. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE), 29, 34-55. Retrieved from http://www.fedu.uaeu.ac.ae/journal/docs/pdf/pdf29/3_E.pdf

Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). How Much Does “Subject Matter” Matter? A Study of Disciplinary Effects in On-Line MBA Courses. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 57-73.

Bates, A. W. (1995). Technology, Open Learning & Distance Education. New York: Routledge.

Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie (2002). What Factor Facilitates Teacher Skill, Teacher Moral & Perceived Student Learning in Technology-Using Classroom? Computer & Education, 39, 395-414.

Chen, C. C., & Jones, K. T. (2007). Blended Learning vs. Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(1), 1-15.

Derek Stockley, Derk (2003). Definitions-key Human Resources and Management Terms. Retrieved from http://derekstockley.com.au/definitions.html

Dittmar, Norbert (1976). Sociolinguistics. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.

Držid, B. F., Sanja Seljan, Jelena M. Džigunovid, Jadranka Lasid-Lazid (2012). Teaching English for Special Purposes Aided by E-learning Platform. International Journal of Excellence in eLearning, 4(1), 1-13. Retrieved from http://elexforum.hbmeu.ac.ae/Proceeding/PDF/Teaching%20English%20for%20Special%20Purposes.pdf

Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1989). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

Falloon, G. (2011). Exploring the Virtual Classroom: What Students Need to Know (and Teachers Should Consider). MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), 439-451.

Gagne, M., & Shepherd, M. (2001). Distance Learning in Accounting. T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 58-65.

Gómez, I., Mercedes Rico, & Emilio Hernández (2007). Learning English for Specific Purposes Through E-Learning Platforms. Reading Matrix Conference Proceedings 2007. Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/conference/pp/proceedings2007/gomez_et.al.pdf

Grandzol, J. (2004). Teaching MBA Statistics Online: A Pedagogically Sound Process Approach. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 237-244.

Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (2010). Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Hirata, & Hirata Yoshihiro (2008). Japanese Students’ Attitudes Towards Hybrid Learning. ICHL ‘08 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Education, 439-449. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cityu.edu.hk/~ichl2008/LNCSProceedings/ICHL2008_YokoHirata_12pages.pdf

Iverson, K., Colky, D., & Cyboran, V. (2005). E-learning Takes the Lead: An Empirical Investigation of Learner Differences in Online and Classroom Delivery. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(4), 5-18.

Jhosta, H. (2005). Difference Between Online Education vs. Traditional Education. Retrieved from http://www.zeronese.net/webmaster- resources/articles-1434.html

Long, R. W., & Russell, G. (1999). Looking Back: Student Attitudes Change over an Academic Year. The Language Teacher, 23(10), 17-27.

Lukman, R., & Krajnc, M. (2012). Exploring Non-traditional Learning Methods in Virtual and Real-world Environments. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 237-247. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_1/21.pdf

Melton, B., Graf, H., & Chopak-Foss J. (2009). Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning Versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-13. Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v3n1/articles/PDFs/Article_MeltonGrafChopak-Foss.pdf

Nagel, D., (2009). Meta-Analysis: Is Blended Learning Most Effective? The Journal. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2009/07/01/Meta-Analysis-Is-Blended-Learning-Most-Effective.aspx?Page=1

National Center for E-learning and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.elc.edu.sa/portal/index.php?mod=content&page=24

Pekarova, Ivana & Bitljanova Vera (2011). Integrating E-Learning in Classroom Based Language Teaching at the Technical University of Liberec, Czech Republic. International Conference “ICT for Language Learning” 4th edition. Retrieved from http://www.pixelonline.net/ICT4LL2011/common/download/Paper_pdf/IEC09-131-FP-Bitljanova-ICT4LL2011.pdf

Ponzurick, T., France, K., & Logar, C. (2000). Delivering Graduate Marketing Education: An Analysis of Face-to-Face Versus Distance Education. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(3), 180-187. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0273475300223002

Singh, H. (2003). Building Effective Blended Learning Program. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.

Saengsook, R. (2006). Learning Theories and eLearning. Third International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society. August 3-4, 2006. Bangkok, Thailand.

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1994). Student Engagement Revisited: Views from Technology-Rich Classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/nl/images/pdf/acotlibrary/rpt21.pdf

Sarasin, L. C. (1999). Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

Sarnoff, I. (1970). Social Attitudes and the Resolution of Motivational Conflict. In M. Jahoda & N. Warren (Eds.) Attitudes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A White Paper: Achieving Success with Blended Learning. Centra Software, ASTD State of the Industry Report, American Society for Training & Development, March 2001, 1-11.

Stiffler, D. J. (2008). A Comparison of Web-enhanced vs. Traditional Classroom Teaching in Women’s Health Nurse Practitioner Education. Topics in Advanced Practice Nursing e-Journal NONPF Educator’s Forum. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/580315

Sulcic, V., & Lesjak, D. (2007). Blended Learning and Study Effectiveness. Issues in Information Systems, 8(1), 127-133.

Tanveer, Muhammad (2011). Integrating E-learning in Classroom-based Language Teaching: Perceptions, Challenges and Strategies. International Conference “ICT for Language Learning” 4th edition. Retrieved from http://www.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL2011/common/download/Paper_pdf/IEC141-252-FP-Tanveer-ICT4LL2011.pdf

Terry, N., Owens, J., & Macy, A. (2001). Student Performance in the Virtual Versus Traditional Classroom. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 2(1), 1-4.

Thomas, M. (2010). Is Online Learning Different from Traditional Learning? Education Centers. Retrieved from http://www.educationcenters.com/faq/online-education/is-online-learning-different-from-traditional-learning-112.php

Vamosi, A., Pierce, B. G., & Slotkin, M. H. (2004). Distance Learning in an Accounting Principles Course-Student Satisfaction & Perceptions of Efficacy. Journal of Education for Business, 79(6), 360-366.

Victori, M., & Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing Metacognition in Self-directed Language Learning. System, 23(2), 223-234.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.sll.1923156320130601.1464

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com