Exploring Learners’ Perception on Communicative Coursebook by Metaphor Analysis: The Case of CECL

Qiang HUANG

Abstract


Despite the popularity of communicative approach in EFL contexts, the use of communicative coursebook in CLT class has not been well discussed. This exploratory study thus investigates through questionnaires how Chinese students view and understand a set of communicative coursebooks—CECL, short for Communicative English for Chinese Learners in classrooms. Questionnaires were distributed to 103 English majors who have studied the material for at least one year at university. Metaphors are used in the questionnaire to pin point both the strengths and weaknesses of the coursebook. By analyzing and categorizing metaphors by the students, the study found that students were generally positive about the material since they regarded the coursebook as all-inclusive, authentic, communicative, culture-bound and stimulating. Whereas, negative metaphors reflected students’ dissatisfaction with the coursebook due to its disorderly organization and outdated content. Blend metaphors revealed their contradictory feelings to both merits and demerits of the coursebook. The results indicated that task-based communicative materials might confuse students who have long been accustomed to text-based coursebooks and grammar teaching. Evaluation on materials from learners and necessary training on teachers are needed to bridge the gap between theory and practice in classrooms.

Keywords


Communicative coursebook; CECL; Metaphor; Metaphor analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alemi, M., & Sadehvandi, N. (2012). Textbook evaluation: EFL teachers’ perspectives on “Pacesetter Series”. ELT Journal, 5(7), 64-74.

Aragno, A. (2009). Meaning’s vessel: A metaphorical understanding of metaphor. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 29(1), 30-47.

Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36-57.

Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (p.iii). London: Equinox.

Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (2000). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach (p.171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 10(4), 7-25.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2006). The Teacher is an Octopus. RELC Journal, 37(2), 236-248.

Guerrero, M. C., & Villamil, O. S. (2002) Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6(2), 95-120.

Guner, N. (2012). Using metaphor analysis to explore high school students attitudes towards learning mathematics. Education, 133(1), 39-48.

Hiep, P. H., (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal, 61(3), 193-201.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Li, X. J. (1984). In defense of the communicative approach. ELT Journal, 38, pp.2-13.

Li, X. J. (2000). Language teaching, language testing and others. Guangzhou: World Books Publication Company.

Lin, W., Shein, P. P., & Yang, S. C. (2012). Exploring personal EFL teaching metaphors in pre-service teacher education. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 183-199.

Ma, Q. (2009). Key elements in conducting communicative approach to language teaching. Canadian Social Science, 5(2), 46-55.

Masuhara. H. (2011). What do teachers really want from coursebooks. In Tomlinson, B. (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching (p.238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McGrath. I. (2006). Teachers’ and learners’ images for coursebooks. ELT Journal, 60(2), 171-180.

Modell. A. (1997). Reflection on metaphors and affects. Annual Psychoanal, 25, 219-234.

Numan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for communicative classroom (p.194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pishghadam, R., & Pourali, S. (2011). Iranian PhD students’ beliefs about language learning and teaching: A qualitative study. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 27-37, 63-71.

Pitcher, R., & Akerlind, G. S. (2011). Post-doctoral researchers’ conceptions of research: A metaphor analysis. Education, 1(1), 160-171.

Richard, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching (p.15). London: Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (2008). English language materials: A critical review. London: Continuum.

Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed., pp.xi-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, W., Lin, C., & Lee, C. (2011). Thinking of the textbook in the ESL/EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 4(2), 91-96.

Wu, J. 2012, Cameron, L, & Maslen, R, (eds), (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. IJES 12(1), 195-200.

Zohrabi, M. (2011). Coursebook development and evaluation for English for general purposes course. ELT Journal, 4(2), 213-222.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.hess.1927024020130502.2699

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net