Investigating African ‘Digital-Immigrant’ Students’ Reactions to Moodle Resources

Peter A. Aborisade

Abstract


In this study, we investigated the reactions and perceptions of ‘digital immigrant’ students to the adoption of blended learning combining the Moodle VLE and traditional face-to-face instructional delivery method on EAP courses in a Nigerian university of technology. Data sets from extractable online logs for activities, discussion board interaction and two online surveys are triangulated by focus group discussion responses. The data revealed that students’ use of the online components of the courses are high and perceptions of the various values such as relevance, reflective thinking, interactivity, tutor support, interpretation, learning experience and benefit are very positive, and are in the range of 60s to 90s in percentage points. However, peer to peer interaction while positive is not as high, indicating the additional work that need be done in addition to the challenges of infrastructure and cost that students would want addressed. Implications of the findings include the potentials of blended learning in difficult academic contexts and subject areas, the relevance of social interaction platforms in language learning and other subject areas, and the crucial role technology can play in large class contexts.

Key words: Digital immigrant; Moodle; Blended learning; Interaction; Critical thinking; Learner autonomy


Keywords


Digital immigrant; Moodle; Blended learning; Interaction; Critical thinking; Learner autonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aborisade, P.A. (2005a). Language Learning and Knowledge Technologies: How Literate Are

Language Teachers? English Language Teaching Today , 4(1), 29 – 34.

Aborisade, P. A. (2003). ‘Learning Together and Alone’: Methodology in an EST Integrated Skills Course. English Language Teaching Today (ELTT), 2(1), 12-21

Aborisade, P.A. (2010). Initiating Change Using Wiki for EAP Writing in Technology-Poor Nigeria. Humanising Language Teaching, 12(5). Retrieved from www.hlt.co.uk

Barajas, M., & Owen, M. (2000). Implementing Virtual Learning Environments: Looking for Holistic Approach. Education Technology and Society, 3(3 ), 39-53.

Bloor, M. , & St. John, M.J. (1988). Project Writing: The marriage of Process and Product, ELT Documents: 129. Modern English Publications in Association with the British Council.

Boulton, H. (2008). “Managing e-Learning: What Are the Real Implications for Schools?” The Electronic Journal of E-Learning , 6(1), 11 – 18. Retrieved March 27, 2010 from www.ejel.org

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Candlin, C. (1987). ‘Towards Task-Based Language Learning’. In C. Candlin and D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 5 – 22). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Dillenbourg P. (1999). What do you Mean by Collaborative Learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches (pp.1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.

Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. (2002). Interpretive Analysis of an Internet-Based Course Constructed Using a New Courseware Tool Called Moodle. Retrieved February 20, 2012 from http://dougiamas.com/writing/herdsa2002/

Dudley-Evans, T. (1984). The Team-Teaching of Writing Skills. In Williams, R. et al. (Eds.), Common Ground: Shared Interests in ESP and Communication Studies, ELT Documents: 117. Pergamon Press.

Hensley, G. (2005). Creating a Hybrid College Course: Instructional Design Notes and Recommendations for Beginners. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(2). Retrieved March 11, 2012 from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol1_no2_hensley.htm

Hopkins, A. (1988). Teaching Academic Writing on In-Sessional Language Support Courses. Bell at IATEFL, 11 – 20.

Hyland Ken, & Hyland Fiona (1992). Go for Gold: Integrating Process and Product in ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 225 – 242.

Krawiec, S., Salter, D., & Kay, E. (2005). A “Hybrid” Bacteriology Course: The Professor’S Design and

Expectations; The Students’ Performance And Assessment. Microbiology Education, 6, 8-13 (cited in Rodriguez and Anicete, 2010).

Kyriakicou, M. (1999). Electronic-Conferencing: Promoting a Collaborative Community with Learning Opportunities for Developing Teachers. IN Proceeding of the British Educational Research Association Conference, 2-5 September, 1999. University of Sussex at Brighton

Prensky, Marc (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), October. MCB University Press.

Reynard, R. (2007). Hybrid Learning: Challenges for Teachers. THE Journal. Retrieved March 11, 2012 from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2007/05/17/Hybrid-Learning-Challenges-forteachers.aspx?Page=1

Rodriguez, Marissa A., & R. C.A. Anicete (2010). Students’ Views of a Mixed Hybrid Ecology Course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching , 6(4), 791 – 798.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.hess.1927024020130403.3139

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net