Culture-Choosing of Chinese Universities’ Global Citizen Cultivating Curriculum: The Challenges of the Era of Globalization
The 21st century is the century of globalization and also is the century of education. The new international environment requires universities of the world cultivating their graduates to become global citizens. During the process of cultivating global citizens in different countries, cultural orientation is a core problem. In the postmodern perspective on curriculum, curriculum is not only a carrier of education, but also content. Therefore, culture-choosing of the college curriculum should be the core proposition of cultivating global citizens in universities of varying countries. Modern citizen conception is production of Western culture. Under the tide of globalization, a common global citizen society is based on the idea of liberalism. In this sense, Western civilization is the center and liberal democratic value is a common frame of reference for other cultures. So how to coordinate the relationship between the foreign and native culture, has become one of the main challenges of education in non-Western countries. Based on the connotation of Chinese global citizens, we will take the curriculum as a cutting-in point and put forward a new curriculum paradigm which could combine globalization with localization.
Axelrod, P. (2002). Values in conflict: The university, the marketplace, and the trials of liberal education. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press.
Bell, D. (1967, Winter). Notes on the post-industrial society (I). The Public Interest, 6, 24-35.
Bell, D. (1999). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting (3rd ed., p.20). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bennett, C. (1995). Comprehensive multicultural education: theory and practice (3rd ed., p.132). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon Inc.
Berlin, I. (2001). In F. Qiu (Trans.) Bondage and liberation of the Jew (p.6). Nanjing, China: Yilin Press.
Bledstein, B. J. (1976). The culture of professionalism: The middle class and the development of higher education in America. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Bok, D. (1982). Beyond the ivory tower: Social responsibilities of the modern university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Hanvey, Rx. (1982). An attainable global perspective (p.37). New York, NY: American Forum for Global Education.
Gacel-Avila, J. (2005, Summer). The Internationalisation of Higher Education: A Paradigm for Global Citizenry. Journal of Studies in International Education. 9(2), 121-136. doi: 10.1177/1028315304263795
Kant, I. (2000). The corpus of historical and rational criticism. Shanghai, China: The Commercial Press.
Marshall, T. H. (1963). Sociology at the crossroads and other essays. London, England: Heinemann.
Morin, E. (2001). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
Nan, H. J. (2003). Anthology of Nan Huaijin (Vol. 2, p.6). Shanghai, China: Fudan University Press.
Wan, M. G. (2005). Global education and the training of Global Citizen in multicultural background. Journal of The Northwest Normal University (Social Sciences), 6, 99-101.
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138