A Semantics-Pragmatics Approach to the Interpretations of Mandarin Bare Nouns
The present paper attempts to account for different interpretations of Mandarin bare nouns by relating the kind referring vs. object referring interpretations to the semantic distinction between individual-level and stage-level predicates (Kratzer, 1989) and shows that Mandarin bare nouns have a generic interpretation with individual-level predicates. With stage-level predicates, they have a definite interpretation when they are in topic position and an existential interpretation when they are not in topic position.
However, bare nouns often do not appear as arguments of any predicates in natural discourse. The current paper attempts to reconstruct sentence fragments based on contexts and show that the Givenness Hierarchy (Gundel et al., 1993) restricts possible interpretations of Chinese bare nouns and that Relevance Theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1995) is needed to explain how people choose the intended interpretation from the possible ones.
Cheng, Lisa L. S., Rint, Sybesma (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquir, 30(4), 509–542.
Diesing, Molly (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Dong, X. F. (2010). Diachronic Changes of the Referential Properties of Bare Nouns in Chinese. Studies in Language and Linguistics, 30(1), 11-19.
Gao, S. Q. (2004). The Expressions of Generic in Chinese. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 26(3),14-21.
Goldberg, Adele E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp.41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharski, Ron (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307.
Gundel, Jeanette K., & Mulkern, Ann E. (1998). Quantity implicatures in reference understanding. Pragmatics and Cognition, 6(1), 21–45.
Kratzer, Angelika (1989). Stage and individual level predicates. In Carlson, G. N., Pelletier, F. J. (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp.125–175). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Krifka, Manfred, Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., Chierchia, G., Link, A., & Ter Meulen, Alice (1995). Introduction to genericity. In Carlson, G. N., Pelletier, F. J. (Eds.), The Generic Book (pp.1-124). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Li, Audrey (1997). Structures and interpretations of nominal expressions. University of South California, Los Angeles. Unpublished results.
Li, Jie (1997). Predicate types and the semantics of bare nouns in Chinese. In Xu, L. J. (Ed.), The referential properties of Chinese noun phrases (pp.61-84). Paris: Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’ Asie Orientale.
Liu, D. Q. (2002). Semantic and syntactic properties of kind-denoting elements in Chinese. Chinese Language, (5), 411-422.
Lu, B. F. (2004). Distance-marking correspondence as a language universal. Chinese Language, (1), 3-15.
Shi, Y. L. (2002). Discourse Analysis of Chinese referring expressions: An application of Gundel, Hedberg, and Zacharski’s Givenness hierarchy. Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.
Wang, X. Q., & Wang, G. C. (2008). The semantics of bare noun phrases in Mandarin. Modern Foreign Languages, 31(2), 131-140.
- There are currently no refbacks.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
E-mail: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com