The Effect of Explicit Teaching of Lexical Inferencing Strategies on the Vocabulary Learning Among Iranian Field-Dependent and Independent EFL Learners

Milad Chavosh, Mohammad Davoudi


It is claimed that lack of vocabulary knowledge is one of the most challenging issues for foreign language learners. Moreover, both language learners and teachers are after the most viable method of vocabulary learning and teaching. Along the same lines, this study focused on the effect of explicit teaching of lexical inferencing strategies on the vocabulary learning of Iranian foreign language learners with different cognitive styles. To this end, three groups of learners, namely, field dependent, field independent, and a control group of English language learners were formed. Field dependent and field independent language learners received explicit teaching of lexical inferencing strategies while the control group just received the conventional method of vocabulary teaching. The performances of the three groups of the study on a vocabulary posttest were analyzed using one way ANOVA. The results of statistical analysis indicated that both field dependent and field independent language learners outperformed the control group in terms of vocabulary learning. However, no significant difference was found between field dependent and field independent learners in terms of vocabulary learning when they received explicit instruction of inferencing strategies. This led to the conclusion that explicit teaching of lexical inferencing strategies has a positive effect on Iranian foreign language learners with different cognitive orientations.


Cognitive styles; Field-dependence; Field-independence; Lexical inferencing; Vocabulary learning

Full Text:



Ahmadi, A. (2002). On the relationship between motivation, language learning and language learning strategies: A case of high school learners. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students’ academic achievement, field dependent/ independent cognitive styles and attitude toward computers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 289-297.

Bensoussan, M., & Laufer, B. (1984). Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 7(1), 15-31.

Blanton, E. L. (2004). The influence of students’ cognitive style on a standard reading test Administered in three different formats (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando.

Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language learning & teaching (4th ed.). New York: Longman.

Brown, E., Stewart, C., & Brailsford, T. (2006, July). Adapting for visual and verbal learning styles in AEH. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2006. Sixth International Conference on (pp.1145-1146). IEEE.

Cakan, M. (2000). Interaction between cognitive styles and assessment approaches (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, USA. Baton Rouge.

Carton, A. S. (1971). Inferencing: A process in using and learning language. In P. Pimsleur & T. Quinn (Eds.), The psychology of second language learning (pp.45-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chapelle, C., & Green, P. (1992). Field Independence/dependence in second-language acquisition research. Language Learning, 42(1), 47-83.

Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Field independence and ambiguity tolerance as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27-46.

Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1986). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. Wheaton, MD: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Clarke, D. F., & Nation, I. S. P. (1980). Guessing the meanings of words from context: Strategy and techniques. System, 8(3), 211-220.

Cohen, A. D., Weaver, S., & Li, T.-Y. (1998). The impact of strategies-based instruction on speaking a foreign language. In A. D. Cohen (Ed.), Strategies in learning and using a second language (pp.107-156). London: Longman.

Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. Language Learning Strategies Around The World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, 61-74.

Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (1980). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(1), 95-110.

Ghonsooly, B., & Eghtesadee, A. R., (2006). Role of cognitive style of field- dependence/independence in using metacognitive and cognitive reading strategies by a group of skilled and novice Iranian students of English. Asian EFL Journals, 8(4), 119-150.

Gollnick, D. M., & Chein, P. C. (1994). Multicultural education in pluralistic society. New York: Macmilla.

Goodman, K. S. (1976). Behind the eye: What happens in reading. In K. S. Goodman & O. S. Niles (Eds.), Reading: Process and program (pp.3-38). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.

Griffiths, C. (2003). Language learning strategy use and proficiency: The relationship between patterns of reported language learning strategy (LLS) use by speakers of other languages (SOL) and proficiency with implications for the teaching/learning situation (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Auckland.

Haastrup, K. (1987). Using thinking aloud and retrospection to uncover learners’ lexical inferencing procedures. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research. (pp.197-212). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Haastrup, K. (1991). Lexical inferencing procedures or talking about words. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.

Hudson, T. (1998). Theoretical perspectives in reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 43-60.

Johnson, J., Prior, S., & Artuso, M. (2000). Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language learning, 50(3), 529-567.

Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Individual differences and instruction. New York: Allen & Bacon.

Kassaian, Z. (2011). Field-dependence/independence as a factor affecting performance on listening comprehension sub-skills: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 188-195.

Kyungsim, H. N., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of EFL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399-415.

Li, X. (1988). Effects of contextual cues on inferring and remembering meanings of new words. Applied linguistics, 9(4), 402-413.

Littlemore, J. (2001). An empirical study of the relationship between cognitive style and the use of communication strategy. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 241-265.

Liu, H.-J. (2008). A study of the interrelationship between listening strategy use, listening proficiency levels, and learning style. ARECLS, 5, 84-104.

Luk, S. C. (1998). The relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 137–147.

Moran, C. (1991). Lexical inferencing in EFL reading course books: Some implications of research. System, 19(4), 389-400.

Morrison, L. (1996). Talking about words: A study of French as a second language learners’ lexical inferencing procedures. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 41-66.

Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 107–134.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

Oxford, R. L., & Leaver, B. L. (1996). A synthesis of strategy instruction for language learners. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.227-246). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195-218.

Paribakht, T. S. (2005). The influence of first language lexicalization on second language lexical inferencing: A study of Farsi-speaking learners of English as a foreign language. Language Learning, 55(4), 701-748.

Park, G. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 211-221.

Richards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, note-taking, and field Independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 508-51.

Sadeghi, K., Abolfazli Khonbi, Z., & Pourghafour Langroudy, E. (2014). The relationship between cognitive style and use of reading strategies by Iranian EFL learners. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(1), 8-18. Retrieved from

Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Does field independence relate to performance on communicative language tests? Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3), 79-85.

Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2007). Is field-dependence or independence a predictor of EFL reading performance? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 82-108.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shen, H.-J. (2003). The role of explicit instruction in ESL/EFL reading. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 424-433.

Smith, F. R. (1978). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Wilson.

Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1998). Field dependence-independence in second-language acquisition: Some forgotten aspects. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 1(1), 32-38.

Vahabi, S. (2006). The relationship between EFL learners FD/FI cognitive style, proficiency, and communication strategies in writing. ILI Language Teaching Journal, 2(1), 145-150.

Wenden, A. (1987). How to be a successful language learner: Insights and prescriptions from L2 learners. Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 103-117.

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 661.

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles essence and origins: Field Dependence and Field Independence. Psychological Issues.

Yang, C. (2009). A study of metacognitive strategies employed by English listeners in an EFL setting. International Education Studies, 2(4), 134.

Zeynali, S. (2012). Exploring the gender effect on EFL learners’ learning strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1614.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Studies in Literature and Language

Share us to:   


How to do online submission to another Journal?

If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.

We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:;;

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).


Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada. 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://; Http://;;

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture