1 A Relevance-Theoretical Account of Three Discourse Markers in North Hail Arabic

Murdhy Radad Alshamari

Abstract


The current study addressed the discourse status and functions of three lexical items most frequently used in North Hail Arabic: jamaar, maar and ʔal-muhim. It applied Schourup (1999)’s characteristics of discourse markers: connectivity, optionality, non-truth-conditionality, weak clause association, orality, initiality, optionality and multi-categoriality, so as to check whether these lexical items are actually discourse markers. In addition to confirming their status as discourse markers, the study used one of the main tenets of the Relevance Theory, effort-effect trade-off in order to figure out their actual cognitive functions in discourse building and structuring. It followed that these lexical items maximize the contextual effect of the speaker’s utterance where they show up and minimise the processing effort needed form the part of the hearer to interact properly with the speaker.


Keywords


Discourse markers; North Hail Arabic; The relevance theory; Effort-effect trade-off

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abuata, B., & Al-Omari, A. (2015). A rule-based stemmer for Arabic Gulf dialect. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 27(2), 104-112.

Alhaisoni, E., Jarrah, M. A., & Shehadeh, M. S. (2012). An investigation of evidentiality in the Arabic language. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 260.

Alkohlani, F. A. (2010). The function of discourse markers in Arabic newspaper opinion articles (Ph.D thesis). Georgetown University.

Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Al-Jarrah, R. S. (2011). Debating torment of the grave: An optimality-theoretic account of (inter) textuality. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), E27.

Al-Jarrah, R. S., Abu Dalu, A. M., & Jarrah, M. (2015). A relevance-theoretical account of three Arabic pragmatic operators of concession in a political discourse. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 11(1), 51-76.

Al-Shamari, M. R. (2015). Pragmatic analysis of the particle ʁadɪ in Najdi Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(2), 81.

Al-Sudais, M. S. (1976). A critical and comparative study of modern Najdi Arabic Proverbs (Doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds.

Altakhaineh, A. R. M., Jarrah, M. A., & AlSulayyi, M. N. (2014). Discourse meanings: An application of intertextuality perspective. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 85.

Chafe, W., & Nichols, J. (1991). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Language, (67).

Carston, R., & Uchida, S. (Eds.). (1998). Relevance theory: Applications and implications (Vol. 37). John Benjamins Publishing.

Coulthard, M. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis. Routledge.

Dendale, P., & Tasmowski, L. (2001). Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), 339-348.

Finegan, E. (2014). Language: Its structure and use. Cengage Learning.

Fraser, B., 1987. Pragmatic formatives. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (Eds.), The pragmatic perspective (pp.179-194). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Fraser, B. (1998). Contrastive discourse markers in English. PRAGMATICS AND BEYOND NEW SERIES, 301-326.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.13

Fraser, B. (2006). Towards a theory of discourse markers. Approaches to Discourse Particles, 1, 189-204.

Hajičová, E. (1993). Issues of sentence structure and discourse patterns (Vol.2). Charles University.

Hammouri, Y. M., Jarrah, M. A., & Khawaldeh, S. K. (2013). Intertextuality as a tool to determine syntax. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(2), 209.

Hansen, M. B. M. (1998). The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua, 104(3), 235-260.

Hussein, M., & Bukhari, N. (2008). Discourse markers and procedural meaning: The case of fa in standard Arabic. Kashmir Journal of Language Research, 2(16), 116-133.

Ingham, B. (1994). Najdi Arabic: Central Arabian (Vol.1). John Benjamins Publishing.

Jarrah, M. A. S., & Bader, Y. (2012). The Functions of concessive discourse markers in Arabic: A relevance-theoretical approach (Unpublished MA thesis). Yarmouk University.

Jucker, A. H., & Ziv, Y. (Eds.). (1998). Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (Vol.57). John Benjamins Publishing.

Kiss, K. É. (Ed.). (1995). Discourse configurational languages (p.3). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

Knott, A., & & Dale, R. (1994). Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18(1), 35-62.

Lambrecht, K. (1996). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (Vol. 71). Cambridge University Press.

Obeidat, H., & Al-Jarrah, R. (2012). The legal translator a photocopying machine! International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 588.

Polanyi, L., & Scha, R. (1983). The syntax of discourse. Text 3, 261-270.

Prat-Sala, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 168-182.

Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(3), 367-381.

Redeker, G. (1991). Review article: Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29(6), 1139-1172.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar (pp.281-337). Springer Netherlands.

Roussou, A. (2000). On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementisers. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 1(1), 65-94.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of discourse analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107(3), 227-265.

Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(03), 437-462.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Language and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Taboada, M. (2006). Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(4). 567-592.

Tagliamonte, S. (2005). So who? Like how? Just what? Discourse markers in the conversations of Young Canadians. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1896-1915.

Taha, K. T., Jarrah, M. A., & Al-Jarrah, R. S. (2014). The discoursal Arabic coordinating conjunction wa (and). International Journal of Linguistics, 6(4), 172.

Taha, K., Al-Jarrah, R. S., & Khawaldeh, S. (2013). Determining the intended meaning of words in a religious text: An intertextuality-oriented approach. Canadian Social Science, 9(4), 15-27. 14

Von Heusinger, K. (2002). Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics, 19(3), 245-274.

Zimmermann, M. (2004). Discourse particles in the left periphery. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 35(2), 543-66.

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua ,90, 1-25.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)




Share us to:   


Reminder

How to do online submission to another Journal?

If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada. 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mailoffice@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture