InclusiveDevelopment: The Mode of Equalization of BasicPublic Cultural Service in ChineseUrban and Rural Areas
This paper selects the perspective of urban and rural culture as a starting point to make the research of basic public service equalization. It builds a theoretical framework to analyze inclusive development as the mode of equality of basic public cultural service in Chinese urban and rural areas. Public cultural service refers to the use of public power and resources to protect the cultural rights of citizens, meet the citizens’ basic needs of public culture service. As to perfecting public cultural services, it’s Chinese important subject for cultural mechanism reform and essential aim for cultural construction. Currently there are many questions in constructing public culture service system, for examples, the poor consciousness, imperfect system, insufficient funds investment, old cultural infrastructure and the lagged market. Therefore, we should share the light of local conditions to build a new system of public cultural services in gradually. Inclusive development as the design and effective implementation of public policies and actions that bring about socio-economic and human development, in a way that promotes the capacities and equal opportunities and rights of all people in sustainable harmony with the environment, regardless of his social condition, gender, age, physical or mental condition, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc.. Inclusive development is benefit to soften social contradictions and handle human livelihood, and for building a harmonious society. Through the expansion of poverty-stricken areas of infrastructure and investment in cultural resource development, people can own their equal opportunities to raise their own culture training and quality.
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2012). Research and innovation policies for social inclusion: An opportunity for developing countries. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 147-158.
Bardoel, J., & d’Haenens, L. (2008). Reinventing public service broadcasting in Europe: Prospects, promises and problems. Media, Culture and Society, 30(3), 337-355.
Born, G., & Prosser, A. (2001). Culture and consumerism: Citizenship, public service broadcasting and the BBC’s fair trading obligations. Modern Law Review, 64(5), 657-687.
Chang, X. Z. (2007). Equalization of public services need system support. Outlook Weekly, (07).
Dr Yik Chan, C. (2011). Public service and individual rights: Striking the balance between order, development and freedom of speech in China. Media Culture Society, 34(7), 898-891.
Elbe, S., & Meyer, W. (2005, June). Competition and Regional Governance. Paper presented at the SeventhNordic Environmental Social Science Research Conference, Gothenburg University.
Enli, G. S. (2006, November). Redefining public service broadcasting: Audience participation and multi-platform formats. Paper presented at the RIPE-Conference on Public Service Broadcasting, Amsterdam.
Galor, O. (2011). Inequality, human capital formation and the process of development. NBER Working Paper (No.17058).
Grummell, B. (2009). The educational character of public service broadcasting: From cultural enrichment to knowledge society. European Journal of Communication, 24(3), 267-285.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2005). Media and cultural policy as public policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 95-109.
Jacka, E. (2003) “Democracy as Defeat”: The importance of arguments for public service broadcasting. Television & New Media, 4(2), 177-191.
Larsen, H. (2010). Legitimation strategies of public service broadcasters: The divergent rhetoric in Norway and Sweden. Media, Culture & Society, 32(2), 267-283.
Liao, W. J. (2011). Experience and enlightenment of the western developed countries’ basic public service equalization path selection. Chinese Public Administration, (03). (in Chinese).
Moe, H. (2008). Public broadcasters, the internet, and democracy: Comparing policy and exploring public service media online (Doctoral dissertation). Bergen: University of Bergen.
Nolan, D. (2006). Media, citizenship and governmentality: Deining “The Public” of public service broad-casting. Social Semiotics, 16(2), 225-242.
Paunov, C., & Rollo (forthcoming). Has the Internet fostered inclusive innovation in the developing world? OECD STI Working Paper Series.
Smith, A., Around, E., Fessoli, M., Thomas, H., & Abrol, D. (2012). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Some enduring dilemmas. STEPS Centre and SPRU.
Tang, J. (2006). Equalization of public services to protect the six fundamental rights. Current Affairs Report, (06). (In Chinese).
World Bank. (2006). Indian inclusive growth and service delivery: Building on India’s success developing policy review (Report No.34580-IN).
Ye, X. Q. (2009). Flemming Christiansen, China’s urban-rural integration policies. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, (4), 117-143.
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture (CAOOC)
Address:730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138