Arthur Miller’s All My Sons Through a Marxist Lens

Ansam Ahmed Ghazal, Ali Asbitan Almasaeid

Abstract


This study is a review of the Maxist theory with certain references to the Miller’s play, “All My Sons”, written in 1947. There are few articles conducted as Marxist critiques of capitalism in this play but these articles criticized capitalism without discussing its traits and drawbacks. The study discusses the characteristics and disadvantages of the capitalist system in detail by citing examples from the play. This article contributes to knowledge in various ways as it reminds us of the Marxist theory and its importance in the world of literary theory. It also attempts to prove that phony idealism destroys the family ties and realism is a real representation of human suffering. The current study emphasizes the Marxist claim that religion makes people idealists is far from reality. The article refutes Marxist perspective that opposes establishing family through marriage.

 


Keywords


Marxism; Phony idealism; Capitalism; Marxist criticism; Religion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, M. H. (1999). Marxist criticism. A glossary of literary terms. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Acton, H. B. (2003). The illusion of the epoch: Marxism-leninism as a philosophical creed. Indiana: Liberty Fund.

Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Eagleton, T. (1976). Marxism and literary criticism.USA: University of CaliforniaPress.

Gillespie, T. (2012). Doing literary criticism. ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

Lovibond, S. (1983). Realism and imagination in ethics. MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Marx, K. (1990). Capital: Volume 1. Bens Fowkes (Trans.). London: Penguin Books.

Mayo, H.(1956). Introduction to marxist theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Meyers, J. (2009). The genius and the goddess: Arthur Miller and Marilyn Monroe. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

Miller, A. (1947). All my sons (Reprinted, 1996). Lebanon: York Press.

Murray, E. (1995). Arthur Miller, Dramatist. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.

Parker, R. (2008). How to interpret literature: Critical theory for literary and cultural studies. New York: Oxford University Press.

Plantinga, A. (1983). Reason and belief in god. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Rosen, M. (1996). On voluntary servitude: False consciousness and the theory of ideology. Massachusetts: Library of Congress Cataloging.

Selden, R., et al (1997). A reader’s guide to contemporary literary theory (4th Ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

Tilly, C. (1999). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

What is the definition of idealism? (n,d). Retrieved from http://www.gotquestions.org/idealism-definition.html#ixzz2Yh0Rfzrg

Wollf, J. (2003). Why read marx today?. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zinn, H. (2010). A people’s history of the united states. New York: Harper Collins.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.ccc.1923670020130904.2625

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture (CAOOC)
Address:758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net