The Application of AHP Method for Universities Procurement and Bidding
Accompany with the vigorous development of higher education, the materials and equipment requirements in college are increasing year by year. Just, fair and scientific materials bidding method has a decisive significance to ensure that tendered and bidder’s legitimate rights and interests. So the method to determine the winning company becomes the focus that tender, bidders and bid evaluation committee pay attention. The commonly used methods that review bid, tender side usually depend on the qualitative analysis and logical judgment, lack quantitative analysis. Bid evaluation is multiple objective decision making problem including technology, economy, security, management and other factors. The applications of the AHP method, taking the influence factors of evaluation as a system to consider, show that the qualitative index can be changed into quantitative index, the evaluation process and conclusions is objectively, fairly and reasonably. This paper proposes a method to quantify the relationship between object and factors in bidding universities procurement of materials, based on the AHP Method and analysis of the representative factors in bidding decision. This model is of universal significance in application.
Key words: AHP Method; Universities; Procurement of materials; Biding
LI, Dan (2011). Universities Procurement and Bidding Mechanism of Higher Institutions. Value Engineering, (11), 102.
ZHUO, Yi & ZHOU, Jin (2009). Analysis of Solution to the Problems in Supervision in University Bidding. Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, (11), 73-75.
XU, Lingjun (2010). Long Term Benefit of Government Procurement and Bidding Mechanism of Higher Institutions, Journal of Guangzhou University, (12), 45-50.
LI, Dan & DONG, Zhiguo (2011). The Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Project Bids the Choice. Henan Science, (12), 102.
QIN, Huifang (2010). Discussion on Bidding Evaluation Methods and Evaluation Standards. Value Engineering, (6), 100.
Milgrom P. & Weber R.A (1982). Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econametrica, 50(5), 1089-1122.
HU, Yunquan (2007). Operations Research Course (3rd. Edition, pp. 422-433). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
RUAN, Lianfa (1999). Fuzzy Synthetical Evaluation Applied on Choosing Project. Building Economy, (10), 22-25.
LI, Dan & DONG, Zhiguo (2012). Application of AHP Method in Selection of Project Bidding Opportunities. Henan Science, (1), 102.
ZHU, Kejun (1997). The Method and Application of the Fuzzy AHP. Theory and Practice of System Engineering, 17(12), 64-69.
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138