The Poverty Alleviation Model of Local Government Inclusive Innovation: A Case Study on Contiguous Poor Regions in China
Due to the natural, historical, ethnic, religious, political, social and other reasons, the destitute areas covering China’s poor 70% , economic growth driven function is not strong, the conventional means of poverty alleviation work slowly, poverty alleviation and development cycle is longer, poverty is still serious. 14 destitute areas now determined have become the main battle field of poverty alleviation in China. Contiguous poor regions have experienced decades of development, the problems of survival, food and clothing of rural residents have been basically solved. The remarkable achievements have been gained in education, health care, public services, and environmental protection. But there are still several critical problems which hinder its development. This paper sums up these problems from micro, meso and macro aspects, and analyzes the reasons of them.
This paper builds a theoretical framework to analyze inclusive innovation of poverty alleviate for local government. Inclusive innovation as a new theory aims to get more performance for less cost for more people. Inclusive innovation is to promote economic development results to benefit the majority of society engines, is to promote sustainable economic development and effective way. Inclusive innovation is to make all of the people, especially disadvantaged groups to participate in innovation activities, so that innovations spread to all of the people, to increase people’s opportunities for innovation and creativity, and make everyone benefit from innovation activities. Through the expansion of productive employment, increase poverty-stricken areas of infrastructure and investment in education and human resource development and other means, people can balance sharing opportunities, enhance the ability to escape poverty and be rich.
Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Philadelphia, PA:Wharton Business School Publishing.
Kraay, A. (2006). When is growth pro -poor? Evidence from a panel of countries. Journal of Development Economics, 80, 198 -227.
InfoDev (2007). ICT, Innovation, and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: A Multi-Country Study of Poland, Russia, and the Baltic Countries, Washington, DC.
Adler, R. and M. Uppal (2008). M-powering India: Mobile communications for inclusive growth. Report of the third annual joint roundtable on communications policy. The aspen institute India.
Loayza, N., & C. Raddatz (2010). The composition of growth matters for poverty alleviation. Journal of Development Economics , 93, 137 -151.
Confederation of Indian Industry Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Development (CII CESD) (2011), Sustainable and Inclusive Innovation. Strategies f or Tomorrow’s World, CII CESD.
Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 743–84.
Gerard George, Anita M. McGahan, & Jaideep Prabhu (2012, June). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studie, 49(4), s661-s683.
Ansari, S., Munir, K. and Gregg, T. (2012). “Impact at the “bottom of the pyramid”: the role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49,813–842.
Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: a recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion?. Journal of Management Studies , 49, 785–812.
Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible. Generate Breakthrough Growth. New York: Jossey-Bass.
OECD. (2012). Innovation and Inclusive Development CONFERENCE DISCUSSION REPORT Cape Town, South Africa 21 November 2012.
Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2012). Research and innovation policies for social inclusion: An opportunity for developing countries. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 147 -158.
Smith, A., Around, E., Fessoli, M., Thomas, H., & Abrol, D. (2012). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Some enduring dilemmas. STEPS Centre and SPRU.
Shariff, Abusaleh, Prabir Ghosh, & Samir K. Mondal (2002, November). Indian Public Expenditures on Social Sector and Poverty Alleviation Programmes during 1990s. Working Paper, 169. Overseas Development Institute.
Ali, Ifzal and M. Pernia (2003, January). Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: What is the Connection?. Policy Brief Series (No.13). Economics and research Department (ERD), Asian Development Bank. Available at : <http://www.adb.org/Economics/default.asp>.
Paul Collier & David Dollar (2002). Aid allocation and poverty reduction. European Economic Review, 45(1), 1-26.
Fan, S., Zhang, L. X., & Zhang, X. B. (2002). Growth, inequality and poverty in rural China: The role of public investments [Research Report. Number 125]. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Mukherjee, Anit, & Bandyopadhyay, K. R.(2004, May). “Rethinking rural poverty alleviation”, an opinion piece in the column. From the ivory tower. Financial Express.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2006), Pro-poor targeting and accountability of local governments in West Bengal. Journal of Development Economics, 79, 303-327.
Ravallion, M. (2009). Decentralizing eligibility for a federal antipoverty program-a case study for China. The World Bank Economic Review, 23(1), 1-30.
Skoufias, E., & Coady, D. (2007). Are the welfare losses from imperfect targeting important. Economic, 74, 756-776.
Chang, X. Z. (2012). Inclusive innovation of system——Theoretical study on Chinese reform, Cross-strait Integration and New Universal Civilization. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Sciences), (5), 1-15.
Wu X. B., & Jiang Y. B. (2012, Nov.). Where inclusive innovation emerges: Conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Systems & Management, 21(6), 736-747
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture (CAOOC)
Address:730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138