Constructing the Self-concept through Culture: A Study with Indigenous and Mestizos Students from Different Educative Settings in Chiapas (Mexico)

Moisès Esteban Guitart, José Bastiani Gómez


This study explored self-concept among 631 adolescents (410 mestizos and 221 indigenous) from the Intercultural University of Chiapas (331), the Autonomous University of Chiapas (150) and University of Altos de Chiapas (150). Our aim was to compare the results of the personal and social self-concept task (PSSC) between the students that participating in these three universities. We predicted, following the MMM approach of culture’s impact on self concept, that students will have different self-concepts because they participating in different educative settings. Specifically, we expected that adolescents who are members of the Intercultural University of Chiapas will score significantly higher on social categories in self-concept task than students who are members of the private University of Altos de Chiapas and Autonomous University of Chiapas. The results supported this hypothesis. We conducted an analysis of variance (ANOVA), showing significant differences in the studied groups. We suggested that proximal process is the mechanism through which culture influences individuals.
Key words: Self-Concept; Indigenous; Mestizos; Individualism Versus Collectivism; Proximal Process

Resumé: Cette étude a exploré le concept de soi chez 631 adolescents (410 métis et 221 autochtones) venant de l'Université interculturelle du Chiapas (331), l'Université autonome du Chiapas (150) et l'Université d' Altos de Chiapas (150). Notre objectif était de comparer les résultats de la tache du concept de soi personnelle et sociale (CSPC) entre les étudiants de ces trois universités. Nous avions prédit, en suivant l'approche de l'impact de la culture sur le concept de soi, que les élèves ont de différentes conceptions de soi, car ils participent à de différentes institutions éducatives. Plus précisément, nous avons espéré que les adolescents qui sont membres de l'Université interculturelle du Chiapas auraient des notes plus élevées en catégories sociales dans la tache du concept de soi que les étudiants qui sont membres de l'Université privée d' Altos de Chiapas et ceux de l'Université autonome du Chiapas. Les résultats a confirmé cette hypothèse. Nous avons effectué une analyse de variance (Andva), ce qui monte des différences significatives dans les groupes étudiés. Nous avons suggéré que le processus proximal était le mécanisme par lequel la culture influence les individus.
Mots-clés: Concept De Soi ; Autochtones ; Metis ; Individualisme Contre Collectivisme ; Processus Proximal


Self-Concept; Indigenous; Mestizos; Individualism Versus Collectivism; Proximal Process; Concept De Soi ; Autochtones ; Metis ; Individualisme Contre Collectivisme ; Processus Proximal


Adams, G., & Markus, H. R. (2004). Toward a conception of culture suitable for a social psychology of culture. In M. Schaller & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 335-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133-151.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press.

Fábregas, A. (2006). Chiapas. Culturas en movimiento. Tuxtla Gutiérrez: Editorial Viento al Hombro.

Heine, S. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of east asian and north american selves. Journal of Adolescence, 69(6), 881-906.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 90-103.

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychologi, 72(6), 1245-1267.

Markus, H. S. (2004). Culture and personality: Brief for an arranged marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(1), 75-83.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Culture, self, and the Reality of the Social. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4), 277-283

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.

Oyserman, D., & Lee, W. S. (2007). Priming “culture”: Culture as situated cognition. In S. Kitayama and D. Cohen (Eds.). Hadbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 255-275). New York: Guilford.

Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. (2008a). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311-342.

Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. (2008b). A situated cognition perspective on culture: Effects of priming cultural syndromes on cognition and motivation. In R. Sorrentino & S. Yamaguchi (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition across Cultures (pp. 237-265). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

Oyserman, D., & Sorensen (2009). Understanding cultural syndrome effects on what and how we think: A situated cognition model. In C. Chiu, R. Wyer, and Y. Hong (Eds.). Problems and solutions in cross-cultural theory. Research and application (pp. 25-52). New York: Psychology Press.

Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism – collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(2), 185 – 198.

Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4), 407-415.

Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924.

Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Share us to:   


  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:;;;

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).


Address: 9375 Rue de Roissy Brossard, Québec, J4X 3A1, Canada 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://; Http://;

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture