Study of the Communication Attitude of Slovenian Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter

Mateja Gačnik, Martine Vanryckeghem

Abstract


Data of investigations with the Communication Attitude Test (CAT) have shown this standardized test to be an internally reliable and valid instrument for differentiating children who stutter (CWS) from those who do not (CWNS). The present study’s aim was to obtain preliminary normative and comparative data of the communication attitude of fluent and stuttering grade-school children using a Slovenian version of the CAT (CAT-SLO). In addition, the effect of stuttering severity and age on the CAT scores were investigated. Preliminary data on item and discriminant analysis are presented. The CAT-SLO was administered to 136 CWNS and 58 CWS. The Stuttering Severity Instrument (SSI) was used to determine stuttering severity. The CWS scored statistically significantly higher on the CAT-SLO than the CWNS. Stuttering severity did not seem to play a role in the extent of the negative speech-associated attitude. Communication attitude was differentially affected by age among the CWS, but not for the CWNS. Four items did not discriminate significantly between the two participant groups. Overall, the CAT-SLO has shown to have a high discriminant power. This test is a useful tool in the assessment of grade-school CWS as the first Slovenian calibrated instrument for the evaluation of communication attitude.


Keywords


Communication attitude test; CAT; Stuttering; Speech-associated attitude; Children

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambrose, N., & Yairi, E. (1994). The development of awareness of stuttering in preschool children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 19, 229-245.

Andrews, G., & Cutler, J. (1974). Stuttering therapy: The relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 39, 312-319.

Bernardini, S., Vanryckeghem, M., Brutten, G., Cocco, L., & Zmarich, C. (2009). Communication attitude of Italian children who do and do not stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 155-161.

Bloodstein, O., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2008). A handbook on stuttering (6th ed.). New York: Thomson Delmar Learning.

Brutten, G. J., & Dunham, S. L. (1989). The communication attitude test: A normative study of grade school children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 14, 371-377.

Brutten, G., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2003a). Behavior assessment battery: A multi-dimensional and evidence-based approach to diagnostic and therapeutic decision making for children who stutter. Belgium: Stichting ntegratie Gehandicapten & Acco Publishers.

Brutten, G., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2003b). Behavior Assessment Battery: A multi-dimensional and evidence-based approach to diagnostic and therapeutic decision making for adults who stutter. Belgium: Stichting Integratie Gehandicapten & Acco Publishers.

Brutten, G., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2007). Slovenian Communication Attitude Test (CAT-SLO). Unpublished manuscript.

Brutten, G., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2007). Behavior Assessment Battery for school-age children who stutter. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, Inc.

Clark, C., Conture, E., Frankel, C., & Walden, T. (2012). Communicative and psychological dimensions of the KiddyCAT. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 223-234.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Conture, E. (2001). Stuttering: Its nature, diagnosis, and treatment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Cooper, E. (1979). Intervention procedures for the young stutterer. In H. Gregory (Ed.). Controversies about stuttering therapy (pp.63-96). Baltimore: University Park Press.

Curlee, R. (1993). Identification and management of beginning stuttering. In R. Curlee (Ed.), Stuttering and related disorders of fluency. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.

DeKort, C. (1997). Validity measures of the communication attitude test. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

De Nil, L., & Brutten, G. (1991). Speech-associated attitudes of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 60-66.

Erickson, R. (1969). Assessing communication attitudes among stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 711-724.

Ezrati-Vinacour, R., Platzky, R., & Yairi, E. (2001). The young child’s awareness of stuttering-like disfluency. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 368-380.

Gregory, H. (2003). Stuttering therapy: Rational and procedures. Boston: Pearson Education.

Guitar, B. (2014). Stuttering: An integrated approach to its nature and treatment (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Jelčić Jakšić, S., & Brestovci, B. (2000). Communication attitudes of children who stutter and those who do not.Journal of Fluency Disorders, 25, 208.

Johannisson, T., Wennerfeldt, S., Havstam, C., Naeslund, M., Jacobson, K., & Lohmander, A. (2009). The Communication Attitude Test (CAT-S): Normative values for 220 Swedish children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 813-825.

Kawai, N., Healey, C., Nagasawa, T., & Vanryckeghem, M. (2012). Communication Attitude of Japanese School-Age Children who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 348-354.

Logan, K., & Yaruss, S. (1999). Helping parents address attitudinal and emotional factors with young people who stutter. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 26, 69-81.

Manning, W. (2010). Clinical decision making in fluency disorders (3rd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage Learning.

Miller, S., & Watson, B. (1992). The relationship between communication attitude, anxiety, and depression in stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 789-798.

Riley, G. (1972). A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 314-320.

Silverman, E. (1980). Communication attitudes of women who stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, XLV, 533-539.

Vanryckeghem, M. (1995). The Communication Attitude Test: A concordancy investigation of stuttering and nonstuttering children and their parents. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 20, 191-203.

Vanryckeghem, M., & Brutten, G. (1992). The communication attitude test: A test-retest reliability investigation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 17, 177-190.

Vanryckeghem, M., & Brutten, G. (1996). The relationship between communication attitude and fluency failure of stuttering and nonstuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 21, 109-118.

Vanryckeghem, M., & Brutten, G. (1997). The speech-associated attitude of children who do and do not stutter and differential effect of age. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 6, 67-73.

Vanryckeghem, M., & Brutten, G. (2011). The BigCAT: A normative and comparative investigation of the communication attitude of stuttering and nonstuttering adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 200-206.

Vanryckeghem, M., & Brutten, G. (2012). A Comparative investigation of the BigCAT and Erickson S-24 measures of speech-associated attitude. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 340-347.

Vanryckeghem, M., Brutten, G., & Hernandez L. (2005). A comparative investigation of the speech-associated attitude of preschool and kindergarten children who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 30, 307-318.

Vanryckeghem, M., Hylebos, C., Brutten, G.,& Peleman, M. (2001). The relationship between communication attitude and emotion of children who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26, 1-15.

Watson, J. (1995). Exploring the attitudes of adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 28, 143-164.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Mateja Gačnik, Martine Vanryckeghem

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture