Student Social Background and Teacher Expectations: The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Abderrahim Bouderbane

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to review the literature dealing with the formation and the effects of varying teacher expectations on students. The study focuses on the characteristics of the self-fulfilling prophecy, and most importantly the factors - student social background in particular - that lead teachers to establish expectations and the effects that varying expectations have on students. This study helps educators develop an awareness of the powerful impact that teacher expectations have in every student’s academic experience through information dealing with teacher behavior toward pupils based on their expectations. The study also shows the different behaviors that teachers must pay attention to while dealing with his/her pupils (learner in general).


Keywords


Pupils; Social background; Teachers expectations; The self-fulfilling prophecy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bamburg, J. (1994). Raising expectations to improve student learning. Oak Brook, IL:North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

Bootzin, R. R., Bower, G. H., Zajonc, R. B., & Hall, E. (1986). Psychology today: An introduction. Random House: New York.

Brattesani, K. A.; Weinstein, R. S.; & Marshall, H. H. (1984). Student Perceptions of Differential Teacher Treatment as Moderators of Teacher Expectation Effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 236-247.

Brookover, W. B.; Beamer, L.; Efthim, H.; Hathaway, D.; Lezotte, L.; Miller, S.; Passalacqua, J.; & Tornatzky, L. (1982). Creating Effective Schools: An inservice program for enhancing school learning climate and achievement. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications,Inc.

Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers’ communication of differential expectations for children’s classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.

Campbell, J., & Simpson, F. (1996). Facilitating and supporting independent living London. Disablement Income Group

Caruthers, L. (1997). Classroom interactions and achievement. Retrieved September 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.mcrel.org/resources/noteworthy/loycec.asp

Cooper, H. M., & Good, T. L. (1983). Pygmalion grows up: Studies in the expectation communication process. New York: Longman.

Franzoi, S. L. (1996). Social psychology. USA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Inc.

Horowitz ,A. I., & Bordens, K. S. (1995). Social psychology. Toronto: Mayfield Publishing Company.

Goldenberg, C. (1992). The limits of expectations: A case for case knowledge about teacher expectancy effects. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 517-544.

Gonder, P. O. (1991). Caught In the middle: How to unleash the potential of average students. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1978). Looking in classrooms (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Good, T. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 32-47.

Marshall, H. H., & Weinstein, R. S. (1985). It’s not how much brains you’ve got, it’s how you use it: A comparison of classrooms expected to enhance or undermine students’ selfevaluations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education; Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; Chicago, IL: Spencer Foundation (ED 259 027).

Hurley, A. E. (1997). The effects of self-esteem and source credibility on self-denying prophecies. Journal of Psychology, 131(6), 581-595.

Merton, R. K. (1968). The self-fulfilling prophecy: A reappraisal. In Merton, social theory and social structure (2nd ed., pp.475-490). New York: Free Press.

Raffini, J. P. (1993). Winners without losers: Structures and strategies for increasing student motivation to learn. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.

Tauber, R. T. (1998). Good or bad, what teachers expect from students they generally get (Report Number EDO-SP-97-7). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 426 985)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11500

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 abderrahim Bouderbane

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada. 
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture