Implementing Effect of Chinese Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure Policy: Empirical data from A-Share Listed Companies in Heavy Pollution Industry
Corporate environmental information disclosure policy (CEIDP) is a system tool for solving the asymmetry problem of corporate environmental information. Relevant literature suggests that there are obvious differences on implementing effect of CEIDP in different countries, regions, and industries. As far as implementing effect of CEIDP is concerned, the domestic researches have distinct opinions. Because of relating the single corporate environmental governance, environmental protection and environmental investment decision-making in microscopic scales and China’s sustainable development strategy goals in macroscopic view, it is of theoretical value and practical significance to estimate implementing effect of CEIDP. Based on the mechanism of CEIDP, this article analyses comprehensively the relationship between corporate environmental disclosure and its system, builds a comprehensive index system by system function analysis, taking 2008-2010 A-share listed companies in heavy polluting industries for the study sample, and makes use of Wilcoxon rank sum test to appraise implementing effect and its lagged effects. The research results show that CEIDP is not only a statistically significant effect, but also has a lagged effect. This paper builds an operable and reflecting effect of CEIDP index system, and introduces non-parametric test method to the Evaluation of CEIDP, thus enriching the theory of CEIDP.
Barth, M. E., Monichols, M. F., & Wilson, G. P. (1997). Factors influence firms ‘Disclosures about environmental liabilities. Reviews Accounting Studies, 2(1), 35-64.
Charles, H., Cho, M. F., & Dennis, M. P. (2012). Corporate disclosure of environmental capital expenditures: A test of alternative theories. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(3), 486-507.
Cheng, L. Y., & Li, Z. M. (2011). Influence factors analysis on the corporate environmental information disclosure. Economic and Management Study, (11), 83-90.
Cowan, S., & Gadenne, D. (2005). Australian corporate environmental reporting: A comparative analysis of disclosure practices across voluntary and mandatory disclosure systems. Journal of Accounting & Organizational, 1(2), 165-179.
Crawford, E. P., & Williams, C. C. (2010). Should corporate social reporting be voluntary or mandatory? Evidence from the banking sector in France and the United States. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 512-526.
Eisner, M. A. (2004). Self-regulation: Toward genuine regulatory reinvention in the United States. Governance an International Journal of Policy and Administration, 17(2), 145-167.
Fallan, E., & Fallan, L. (2009). Voluntarism versus regulation: Lessons from public disclosure of environmental performance information in Norwegian companies. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 5(4), 472-489.
Frost, G. (2007). The introduction of mandatory environmental reporting guidelines Australian evidence. ABACUS, 43(2), 190-216.
Hughes, S. B., Anderson, A., & Golden, S. (2001). Corporate environmental disclosures are they useful in determining environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(3), 217-240.
Lu, X., & Li, J. M.. (2010). Study on present situation of Chinese listed company environmental information disclosure: 2007 and 2008 Shanghai A-share listed companies in the manufacturing industries are taken as the example. Audit and Economic Study, 25(3), 62-69.
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2010). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of aduit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41.
Pahuja, S. (2009). Relationship between environmental disclosures and corporate characteristics: A study of large manufacturing companies in India. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(2), 227-244.
Raiborn. C. A., Butler, J. B., & Massoud, M. F. (2011). Environmental reporting: Toward enhanced information quality. Business Horizons, 54(5), 425-433.
Shen, H. T., & Liu, J. H. (2010). Characteristics, causes and function of the foreign corporate environmental information disclosure. China’s Population Resources and Environment. 16(3), 76-80.
Williams, S. M. (1999). Voluntary environmental and social accounting disclosure practices in the Asia-Pacific region: An international empirical test of political economy theory. The International Journal of Accounting, 34(2), 209-238.
Yusoff, H., Lehman, G., & Nasir, N. M. (2006). Environmental engagements through the lens of disclosure practices: A Malaysian story. Asian Review of Accounting, 14(1), 122-148.
Zhang, Y., & Guan M. (2009). Empirical study on the external influencing factors of the corporate environmental information disclosure. China’s Population Resources and Environment, 12(6), 103-106.
Zhang, L., Mol, A. P. J., He, G. Z., & Lu, Y. L. (2010). An implementation assessment of China’s environmental information disclosure decree. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 22(10), 1649-1656.
- There are currently no refbacks.
If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures
Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138