Traditional Knowledge in Explanation Object of Declaration of Intention on Commercial Paper and Reflection

Jinhua JIN, Yejing AO

Abstract


Unitary constructivism theory in the traditional act on commercial paper is based on non-causative nature of act on commercial paper, which believes that the right of commercial paper is established by declaration of intention on the commercial paper, and the content of declaration of intention can only be confirmed by recording of the commercial paper and declaration of intention on the commercial paper only regards the literary content recorded on the commercial paper as the explanation object. However, as a result of the relative non-causative nature of the act on commercial paper, we should not lump under one head that explanation of declaration of intention on the commercial paper only has the object of literary recording on the commercial paper and at least the situation of relationship of causes between direct parties involved can only constitute content of declaration of intention.


Keywords


Declaration of intention on the bill; Explanation object; Relative non-causative nature; Two-phase theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hiroyuki, F. (1999). 手形行為についての覚書 [A note on the bill act]. Kansai University Repository, 49(2 & 3).

Hiroyuki, F. (1985). 手形行為の解釈について――いわゆる手形客観解釈の原則 [Principle of so-called bill objective interpretation: Interpretation of bill act]. Kansai University Repository, 35(3 & 4, 5).

Kazuyuki, N. (2000). 手形行為の無因性と文言性 [For no reason and the classical Chinese of the bill act]. In S. Yitirou, K. Yitirou, T. Riyiti, & S. Yitirou (Eds.), 現代手形小切手法講座. Seyi bun tou Press.

Larenz, K. (2003). Allgemeiner teil des deutschen burgerlichen rechts [General part of the German burger lichen law] (1st ed., Vol.2), Wang Xiaoye, et al. (Trans.). Law Press.

Shi, S. K. (2000). General provisions of civil law (1st ed.). China University of Political Science and Law Press.

Tong, A. S. (2002). Civil legal act (1st ed.). China Renmin University Press Co., Ltd..

Zhao, X. H. (1999). Negotiable Instruments Law of the People’s Republic of China (1st ed.). Court Press.

Zhao, X. H. (2002). Study on problems in Negotiable Instruments Law (1st ed.). Law Press.

Zhao, X. H. (2007). Theory of Negotiable Instruments Law (1st ed.). Jilin University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2F3798

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; css@cscanada.net; css@cscanada.org

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture

Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138

Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

E-mail:css@cscanada.net, css@cscanada.org