The Development of an Evaluation Model on Learning Management of Foreign Language Teachers in the World-Class Standard Primary Schools

Penprapa Kuapituk, Songsak Phusee-orn, Nawamin Prachanant

Abstract


The research aimed to develop the evaluation model on learning management of foreign language teachers in the world class standard primary schools by using research and development process. The research was divided into 4 stages: (1) analyzed and synthesized the concept of learning management of foreign language teachers in the world class standard primary schools (2) constructed an evaluation model (3) trialed the evaluation model and (4) evaluated the evaluation model. The instruments used in this research consisted of an interview form, observation forms, evaluation forms and a questionnaire. The qualitative data were analyzed by contents analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed through basic statistics comprising percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Test and The Mann-Whitney U-Test were employed for testing hypotheses. The results of the study were as follows: 1) The concept of learning management of foreign language in the world class standard primary schools followed the principles of the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E 2551. It was integrated by the world class curriculum to accelerate the potential of learners to the citizenship of the world; however, most WCS have not had the evaluation model on learning management. 2) The evaluation model on learning management of foreign language teachers in the world class standard primary schools consisted of 4 components: (1) the goal of evaluation (2) the objects of evaluation (3) the method of evaluation, and (4) the criteria of evaluation. 3) The discriminant validity of the evaluation model was statistically significant at .01 level. This improved the development of teachers on learning management which indicated that the mean score of the second evaluation was higher than the first evaluation with statistically significant at .01 level. 4) The evaluation model on learning management of foreign language teachers in the world class standard primary schools had overall standards for utility, feasibility propriety and accuracy at the high level. Classified by four aspects, it was found at the highest level in utility and accuracy, while other aspects were at a high level.

Key words: An evaluation model; Learning management; Foreign language teachers; The World-Class Standard Schools (WCS)


Keywords


An evaluation model; Learning management; Foreign language teachers; The World-Class Standard Schools (WCS)

References


Alecio, Rafael Lara et al. (2009). Teachers Pedagogical Differences During ESL Block Among Bilingual and English-Immersion Kindergarten Classrooms in a Randomized Trial Study. Bilingual Research Journal, 32(1), 77-100.

Buason, R. (2008). Philosophy of Research. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Bureau of Academic Affair and Educational Standards. (2008). Indicators and Core Curriculum of Foreign Language Department. Bangkok: The Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand Printing Press.

Edwards, M. R., & Ewen, A. J. (1996). 360-Degree Feedback: Royal Fail or Holy Grail? Career Development International, 1(3), 28-31.

Fongsri, P. (2006). Educational Evaluation: Concept to Practice. Bangkok: Tieam Printing Inc..

Horwitz, Amanda Rose et al. (2009). Succeeding with English Language Learners: Lessons Learned from the Great City Schools. The Council of the Great City Schools.

Kanjanawasee, S. (2000a). Learning Evaluation: The Policy Brief. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Co., Ltd..

Kanjanawasee, S. (2000b). A New Dimension in Evaluation: Child-Centered Education. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Co., Ltd..

Kanjanawasee, S. (2009). Evaluation Theory (7thed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Kiddee, K. (2004). A Development of the Evaluation Model of the Student-Centered Learning Management. Education (Educational Measurement and Evaluation) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Nevo, David (1983). The Conceptualization of Education: An Analytical Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 117-128.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2010). The Course to Operate the World Class Standard Schools. Bangkok: The Agricultural Co-Operative Federation of Thailand Limited Printing.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2011). The Guide for Quality Evaluation on Basic Education Standards for Internal Quality Assurance. Bangkok: National Buddhism Office Press.

Pansri, O. (2008). The Development of an Evaluation Model on Learning Management for 2 Languages in Bilingual Schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Naresuan University, Thailand.

Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to Use Qualitative Method in Evaluation. California: Sage Publications, Inc..

Srisa-ard, B. (2000). Research in Measurement and Evaluation. Bangkok: Suweeriyasarn Co., Ltd..

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2001). Evaluation Model. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Yook, Cheong Min (2010). Korean Teachers Beliefs About English Language Education and Their Impacts upon the Ministry of Education-Initiated Reforms (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses databases (UMI No. AAT 3425850).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120806.2563

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture