A Development of the Evaluation Model for Faculty Organizational Effectiveness in Public Universities

Samaporn Sirilap, Prawit Erawan, Prasert Ruannakarn

Abstract


The purposes of this research were to: 1) studying current conditions, problems, and needs to develop, and studying appropriate elements and indicators of the evaluation for organization in public universities, 2) developing the evaluation model for faculty organizational effectiveness in public universities, and 3) evaluating the proposed evaluation model for faculty organizational effectiveness in public universities. The research was conducted through a process of research and development procedures consisting of 3 steps including: step 1. model’s investigation and analysis, from administration instructor officer and student total 729 persons from 36 faculty organization, step 2. model’s verification, from 7 experts about evaluation organization or quality assurance, and step 3. model’s implementation and evaluation, from assessor administrator instructor officer and stakeholders total 255 persons. Tools of research consisted of: questionnaires, Interview, and record observations. The statistics used in this study were percentage, mean and standard deviation. The results were as follow: 1) The results of the evaluation organization is currently and needs were found at a high level, the assessment problems summarizes 9 main points, and appropriate elements and indicators were found at a high level. 2) The results of the evaluation model for faculty organizational effectiveness found consisted of 8 sections: Principles of assessment present the objective assessment and evaluation model, Structure of assessment, Elements of assessment organizational effectiveness, Assessment methods consisted of evaluation process and audit process, Evaluation criteria and scoring system, Assessment tools and how to use them, The operating system to support the assessment and The use of the assessment results. 3) According to the evaluation of using the model, it was found that 3.1 Effectiveness of the organization Education Faculty, Mahasarakham University found at a highest level. 3.2 The results of the implementation were found at a moderate to high level. and 3.3 The evaluation results of appropriateness and the ability to use the evaluation were found at a highest level.

Key words: Evaluation model; Organizational effectiveness; Public university


Keywords


Evaluation model, Organizational effectiveness, Public university

References


Gregory A. (1999). The Road to Integration. Reflections on The Development of Organizational Evaluation Theory and Practice. University of Humberside, Hull, UK.

Cameron, K. S. & Whetten, D. A. (1983). Organizational effectiveness: a Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press.

Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring Organizational-Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher-Education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, pp. 604-632.

Cameron, K. (1986). A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and Its Predictors. Management Science, 32, 87-112.

Cameron, K. (2005). Organizational Effectiveness: Its Demise and Re-emergence through Positive Organizational Scholarship. In K. G. Smith and M. A. Hitt, Eds. Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development (pp. 394-429). New York: Oxford University Press.

Capps, Patricia (2008). The use of Kirkpatrick’s four levels of evaluation by performance improvement practitioners (Doctoral Dissertation). Indiana University, USA.

Chang, Ya-Hui Elegance (2010). An Empirical Study of Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Model in the Hospitality Industry (Doctoral Dissertation). Florida International University, USA.

Clott, Christopher B. (1995). The Effects of Environment, Strategy, Culture, and Resource Dependency on Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness of Schools of Business. The Annual Meeting of the Association for the study of Higher Education 20th(Vol. 32, pp. 2-5). Orlando.

Heck, R.H. (2005). Examining School Achievement over Time: A Multilevel, Multi-group Approach. In W.K. Hoy and C.G. Miskel (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Educational Policy and School Outcomes (pp. 1-28). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Hoy, Wayne K. & Miskel, Cecil G. (2008). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (8thed). New York: McGraw-Hill.-

Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2003). Posting Organizational Effectiveness as a Second-Order Construct in Hong Kong Higher Education Institutions. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 705-726.

Ludmila Praslova (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four Level Model of Training Criteria to Assessment of Learning Outcomes and Program Evaluation in Higher Education. Anguard University, Southern California.

Lynne Miller Franco, et al. (2002). Sustaining Quality of Healthcare: Institutionalization of Quality Assurance. Quality Assurance Project.

Newman, David (2011). An Empirical Validation of Guskey’s Professional Development Evaluation Model Using Six Years of Student and Teacher Level Reading Data (Doctoral dissertation). Cleveland State University.

Parhizgari, A. M., & Gilbert, G. R. (2004). Measures of Organizational Effectiveness: Private and Public Sector performance. Omega, 32, 221-229.

Pounder, D. G., Ogawa, R.T., & Adams, E. A. (1995). Leadership as an Organization-Wide Phenomena: Its Impact on School Performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564-88.

Rashad Massoud, et al. (2001). A Modern Paradigm for Improving Healthcare Quality. Quality Assurance Project.

Ruetinan Samuttai (2006). Development of a Multi-dimensional and Integrated causal Model of Faculty Effectiveness in Higher Education Institutions (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Ruja Rodkhem (2004). The Development of an Evaluation Model for the Organizational Effectiveness of Colleges under the Ministry of Public Health By the Balanced Scorecard Approach (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5thed). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Small, Joan E. (2009). Determinants of Organizational Effectiveness and an Integrated Performance Evaluation Model for Nonprofit Organizations. D.P.A., University of Illinois, Springfield.

Yuwaranee Sukwinya (2006). A Development of the Organization Effectiveness Causal Model of Bursing Colleges under the Ministry of Public Health (Doctoral Dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120805.6353

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture