The Reception of American Culture in the Middle East after “The Arab Spring”

Nazmi Al-Shalabi, Marwan Obeidat, Shadi Neimneh


Despite its being old, the relationship between the Middle East and the West(America included)has been marked by confrontation, intervention, and stereotyping. The West, driven by its interests and blinded by bias and hostility, has been keen on colonizing the Middle East, empowering Israel,and foolishly disregarding the aspirations of Arabs and Muslims, which tremendously contributes to generating anti-American sentiments and bitterness. These feelings,fed further by the pro-Israeli tilt American policy,do hinder the advancement of the US national interests which have been subordinated to those of Israel that has been receiving direct and unconditional support from the West. Such a type of support for Israel that occupies Palestine demonstrates folly, disregard of laws, and blindness to reality. This blindness itself underlies America’s reluctance to adopt a proactive role in the “Arab Spring”, the political movements sweeping the Middle East for the first time in decades. This reluctance has impacted the image of the US that has, unfortunately, been negative due to America’s taking sides with Israel at the expense of Arabs’ natural needs and inalienable rights in Palestine. This American stance has been responsible for the Israelis’ perpetrating atrocities, turning a deaf ear to the Security Council resolutions, and usurping Palestine in defiance of all international laws. By supporting Israel that acts this way, the US has sacrificed its interests, has lost its credibility, has isolated itself, and has failed to be a leading power. To regain its status, the US should reexamine its policy,stop its unconditional support for Israel,and align itself with peoples’ aspirations.
Key words: Stereotyping; Double standards; Anti-American sentiments; Unconditional support; Regain

En dépit de son être vieux, la relation entre le Moyen-Orient et l'Occident (Amérique est incluée) a été marquée par la confrontation, l'intervention, et les stéréotypes. L'Occident, conduit par ses intérêts et aveuglés par les préjugés et l'hostilité, a été vif sur la colonisation du Moyen-Orient, l'autonomisation Israël, et sottement sans tenir compte des aspirations des Arabes et des musulmans, ce qui contribue énormément à générer sentiments anti-américains et d'amertume. Ces sentiments, alimenté encore par la politique d'inclinaison pro-israélien américain, ne entravent l'avancement des intérêts nationaux américains qui ont été subordonnés à ceux d'Israël qui a reçu un soutien direct et inconditionnel de l'Occident. Un tel type de soutien à Israël qui occupe la Palestine démontre la folie, le mépris des lois, et la cécité à la réalité. Cet aveuglement se sous-tend réticence des Américains à adopter un rôle proactif dans le «printemps arabe», les mouvements politiques balayant le Moyen-Orient pour la première fois depuis des décennies. Cette réticence a influencé l'image de l'américain qui a malheureusement été négative en raison de prendre parti de l'Amérique avec Israël aux dépens des Arabes "besoins naturels et les droits inaliénables en Palestine. Cette position américaine a été responsable pour les Israéliens "atrocités perpétrer, faisant la sourde oreille aux résolutions du Conseil de sécurité, et d'usurper la Palestine au mépris de toutes les lois internationales. En soutenant Israël, qui agit de cette façon, les Etats-Unis a sacrifié ses intérêts, a perdu sa crédibilité, s'est isolé et n'a pas réussi à être une puissance de premier plan. Pour retrouver son statut, les Etats-Unis devraient réexaminer sa politique, cesser son soutien inconditionnel à Israël, et de s'aligner avec les aspirations des peuples.
Mots clés: Stéréotypes; Doubles standards; Sentiments anti-américains; Soutien Inconditionnel; Retrouver


Stereotyping; Double standards; Anti-American sentiments; Unconditional support; Regain;Stéréotypes; Doubles standards; Sentiments anti-américains; Soutien Inconditionnel; Retrouver


Alkadry, Mohammad (2004). Colonialism in a Postmodern Age: The West, Arabs and “The Battle of Baghdad,” Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal 9(1), 35-45.
Allison, Robert (2000).The Crescent Obscured: The United States and the Muslim World, 1776-1815.London: University of Chicago Press.
Crocker, C.A. (2011). The Arab Spring. United States Institute of Peace. Washington, D.C. Available at:
Dreyfuss,R. (2011). Washington’s Weak Response to Arab Awakening. The Nation.
Findley, Paul. (2002). Reflecting on Our Relationship with Israel Http: // (accessed on 11.3.2010).
Gaier (2011). Will the Arab Spring Lead to a Post –American Era? Arab American Institute. Available At: Www.Aaiusa.Org/Blog/Entry/Will-The-Arab-Spring-Lead-To-A-Post-Amerian-Era/
Gunther,J. (2006).A Problem in American Foreign Policy: Palestine.Scoop. Www.Scoop.Co.Nz/Stories/HL0604/500105.Htm
Jensia, Isra. (2008). US-Middle East Policy. Http:// policy. html?cat= 9
Obeidat, Marwan (1996). On Nonnative Grounds: The Place of American Literature in the English Curriculum of Arab World Universities. American Studies International, 34(1), 18-30.
-(2010). Beyond American Borders: the Middle East and the Enigma of Anti-American Sentiments in the Aftermath of 9/11. American Studies Today Online, 17.
Pew Research Center (2011). Arab Spring Fails to Improve US Image. Available at:
Ramazani, R.K. (2011). American Independence Inspires He Arab Spring. The Daily Progress. Available at: arab-spring-ar-1149923
Roussos, S. (2011). Saudi Arabia and USA: The Paradoxical Beneficiaries of the Arab Spring.CEMMIS(Center for Mediterranean, Middle East and Islamic Studies). Available at: &view=article&id=265%3asaudi-arabia-and-usa-the-paradoxical-beneficiaries-of-the-arab-spring&catid=43%3amiddle-east-flashpoints&itemid=66&lang=e
Said, Edward. (1981). Covering Islam. New York: Pantheon.
-(1994). Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.
-(1980). The Question of Palestine. London: Rutledge & Kegan Paul.
Salem, Samra (2008). Anti-Americanism in the Middle East. Global Affairs, Issue 8. Http://www. global affairs es/en/anti-americanism-in-the-middle-east/(accessed on 24.3.2010).
Seale, P. (2011). Challenges Facing the Arabs. The Nation.available
Shehab, S. (2003). The Intention is Clear. Al-Ahram Weekly, 23-29.
Sid –Ahmed M. (1980). Shifting Sands of Peace in the Middle East. International Security, 5(1), 53-79.
Watkins, Eric (1997). The Unfolding US Policy in the Middle East. International Affairs 73, 1, 1-14.
Young, Andrew (2004). The Clash of Civilizations and American Intervention in the Middle East. Http:// html (accessed on 20.3.2011).
Zogby, J. (2003). US Middle East Policy Ignores Realities in the Region. Arab News.
Zunes, Stephen. Ten Things to Know About US Policy in the Middle East. Http:// / ten things _m e policy _ zunes.html (accessed on 14.3.2010).



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c)


  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:;;;

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).


Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://; Http://;

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture