The Analysis of the Impact of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002’s Anti-Money Laundering Provisions on Bankers

Lijun WANG

Abstract


This article examines the impact of the anti-money laundering (AML) regime established by the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) on bankers in the United Kingdom. Through a critical analysis of legal provisions and empirical evidence, this study finds that POCA, while elevating bankers’ professional responsibilities and reinforcing their role in safeguarding financial integrity, has also subjected them to considerable operational and legal pressures. The analysis identifies key challenges, including heightened personal liability, onerous compliance burdens, and ethical dilemmas in client relationships. These challenges arise primarily from ambiguous regulatory guidance and the practice of defensive over-reporting. The study concludes that this well-intentioned framework has inadvertently transformed the banker’s role, creating a fundamental tension between their traditional advisory functions and their duties as de facto frontline regulatory agents. It concludes that striking a balance between these competing demands is crucial for the effectiveness of the AML regime and the long-term sustainability of banking practice.


Keywords


Proceeds of crime act 2002; Anti-money laundering; Bankers; Compliance costs; Suspicious Activity reports; Customer due diligence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayling, J., & Grabosky, P. (2006). Policing by command: Enhancing law enforcement capacity through coercion. Law and Policy, 28(3), 420–440.

Boister, N. (2018). An introduction to transnational criminal law. Oxford University Press.

Crown Prosecution Service. (2021). Money laundering offences. Retrieved January 2, 2025, from https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/money-laundering-offences

Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, OJ L 309/15. (2005).

Gill, M., & Taylor, G. (2004). Preventing money laundering or obstructing business? Financial companies' perspectives on 'know your customer' procedures. British Journal of Criminology, 44(4), 582–594.

Goldby, M. A. (2013). Anti-money laundering reporting requirements imposed by English law: Measuring effectiveness and gauging the need for reform. Journal of Business Law, 2013(4), 367–389.

Ilaria, Z., & King, C. (2021). The challenges of implementing anti-money laundering regulation: An empirical analysis. Modern Law Review, 84(1), 1–32.

Johnston, R. B., & Carrington, L. (2006). Protecting the financial system from abuse: Challenges to banks in implementing AML/CFT standards. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 9(1), 48–61.

KPMG. (2004). Global anti-money laundering survey: How banks are facing up to the challenge. Retrieved May 3, 2025, from https://www.finyear.com/KPMG-s-Global-Anti-Money-Laundering-Survey-2007-how-banks-are-facing-up-to-the-challenge_a2795.html

Levi, M., & Reuter, P. (2006). Money laundering. Crime and Justice, 34(1), 289–375.

Molla Imeny, V. (2021). Perception versus reality: Iranian banks and international anti-money laundering expectations. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(1), 63–79.

Pafitis, S. (2022). Money laundering through cryptoassets: A comparative analysis of the UK and EU approach. Journal of Business Law, 2022(7), 589–613.

Practical Law. (n.d.-a). Money laundering offences in the UK: overview. Retrieved May 29, 2025, from https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/

Practical Law. (n.d.-b). Third Money Laundering Directive (MLD3) and its UK implementation. Retrieved December 29, 2024, from https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/

Schneider, F., & Niederländer, U. (2008). Money laundering: Some facts. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26(3), 1–15.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (n.d.). Money laundering. Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/money-laundering/overview.html

UK Financial Intelligence Unit, National Crime Agency. (2022). Suspicious activity reports annual report 2022. Retrieved April 3, 2025, from https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/who-we-are/publications/632-2022-sars-annual-report-1/file

Legislation and Case Law

Criminal Justice Act 1988. (c. 33).

Drug Trafficking Act 1994. (c. 37).

HKSAR v Li Kwok Cheung George[2014] HKCFA 48.

Hogan v Director of Public Prosecutions[2007] EWHC 978 (Admin).

K Ltd v National Westminster Bank [2006] EWCA Civ 1039.

Kensington International Ltd v Republic of Congo[2007] EWCA Civ 1128.

Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. (c. 29).

R v Anwar[2013] EWCA Crim 1865.

R v Anwoir[2008] EWCA Crim 1354.

R v Da Silva[2006] EWCA Crim 1654.

R v GH[2015] UKSC 24.

R v Haque[2019] EWCA Crim 1028.

R v Pace[2014] EWCA Crim 186.

R v Rogers[2014] EWCA Crim 1680.

R v W[2008] EWCA Crim 2.

Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018. (c. 13).

SC BTA Bank v Ablyazov[2009] EWCA Civ 1124, [2010] 1 WLR 976.

SRA v Tidd[2013] SDT Case No. 11178-2013.

Theft Act 1968. (c. 60).

The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, SI 2017/692.

Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England[1924] 1 KB 461.

United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. (1988).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/13915

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture