Canadian Social Science
The Interpersonal Meaning of Hedges
Abstract
Hedges as a considerable fascinated language phenomena and pragmatic strategy, objectively and widely existed in every aspect of human life. Most researches on hedges focus on its communicative functions. Since the complementarity between systemic-functional linguistics and pragmatics received rare attention, this thesis attempts to find relationships between systemic-functional linguistics and pragmatics. Specifically, this thesis aims at exploring the graduation system of hedges from the perspective of appraisal system. This thesis examines the approximators under the graduation system and shields under engagement system. The analysis shows that different kinds of hedges assume different interpersonal meanings and that the interpersonal function presents rare difference in the Chinese and English courtroom discourse.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hosman, L. A. (1989). The Evaluative Consequences of Hedges, Hesitations, and Intensifies Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles. Human Communication Research, 15(3), 383-406. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00190.x
Jucker, A. H., Smith, S. W., & Lüdge, T. (2003). Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1737–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00188-1
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Novák, V. (2015). Evaluative linguistic expressions vs. Fuzzy categories. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 281, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.08.022
Prince, E. F., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In J. D. Robert (Ed.), Linguistics and the Professions (pp. 83-97). Alex Publishing Corporation.
Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the Communicative Functions of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6
Zhang, Q. (1998). Fuzziness—Vagueness—Generality—Ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00014-3
Zhu, X. (2007). Evaluative Act, Criteria and Context: Towards a Pragmatic Account of Evaluative Discourse. Foreign Language and Literature Research, 03(04), 14-21.
Zhu, Y. (1996). Complementarity between systemic functional linguistics and Pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 01, 06-10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11944
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
