Binary Oppositions and the Meaning of Joyce’s Dubliners

Pyeaam Abbasi, Hussein Salimian

Abstract


James Joyce is known, by Robert Scholes, as the first structuralist. Each Dubliners story is a systematized combination of signs governed by rules that generate meaning within the context of Dublin. Saussure believes that meaning is generated through a system of structured differences in language. Differences in Dubliners appear in the form of binary oppositions from which Barthes believes meaning comes. What the structuralist Joyce does is fixing signifieds that appear in the form of binary oppositions in the structure of Dubliners. Self-negation and paralysis are the underlying themes as well as the main binary oppositions that crop up in the whole collection. Binary oppositions such as man vs. animal; silence vs. speech; liberation vs. promise and past vs. future that become fixed signifieds during the course of the action are also of crucial importance to unifying the whole collection. The interconnectedness of stories creates a system in which meaning is generated. This paper is an attempt to reveal the meanings generated in Dubliners through repeated binary oppositions.

Key words: James Joyce; Dubliners; Difference; Binary opposition; Passivity


Keywords


James Joyce; Dubliners; Difference; Binary opposition; Passivity

References


Attridge, D. (1999). The Cambridge Companion to James Joyce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baker, J. E. (1982). Ibsen, Joyce, and the Living-Dead. English Studies, 63(6), 531-534.

Barker, Ch. (2003). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

Beck, W. (1969). Joyce’s Dubliners: Substance, Vision and Art. Durham: Duke University Press.

Benstock, B. (1988). The Gnomonics of Dubliners. Modern Fiction Studies, 34(4), 519-539.

Campbell, W. J. (2000). The Book of Great Books: A Guide to 100 World Classics. New York: Metrobooks.

Childs, P. (2000). Modernism. London: Routledge.

Eagleton, T. (2005). The English Novel. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.

Eco, U. (1986). The Aesthetics of Chaosmos (E. Esrock, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ellmarm, R. (1966). Letters of James Joyce, Vol. II. New York.

Ferguson, S. C. (1982). Defining the Short Story: Impressionism and Form. Modern Fiction Studies, 28(1), 13-24.

French, M. (1978). Missing Pieces in Joyce’s Dubliners. Twentieth Century Literature, 24(4), 443-472.

Humphries, S. (Director). (1998). Sex in a Cold Climate. Testimony Films, UK.

Jaspers, K. (1965). Nietzsche: An Introduction to the Understanding of His Philosophical Activity (Charles F. Wallraff, & Frederick J. Schmitz, Trans.). Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

Jones, W. P. (1955). James Joyce and the Common Reader. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Joyce, J. (1993). Dubliners. Kent: Wordsworth Classics.

Lowe-Evans, M. (1995). Who Killed Mrs. Sinico? Studies in Short Fiction, 32(3), 395-402.

Magalaner, M. (1959). Time of Apprenticeship: The Fiction of Young James Joyce. London.

Magalaner, M. & Kain, R. M. (1956). Joyce: The Man, the Work, the Reputation. New York: New York University Press.

McGowan, K. (2006). Structuralism and Semiotics. In S. Malpas & P. Wake (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Critical Theory. London: Routledge.

Morrissey, L. J. (1982). Joyce’s Narrative Startegies in ‘Araby’. Modern Fiction Studies, 28(1), 45-52.

Nietzsche, F. (1888). AntiChrist (H. L. Mencken, Trans.). (1918). New York: Knopf.

Nietzsche, F. (1954). On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense. In The Portable Nietzsche (ed.). (Walter Kayfmann, Trans.). New York: Viking Press.

Norris, M. (2003). Suspicious Reading of Joyce’s Dubliners. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press.

Parrinder, P. (1984). James Joyce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rice, P., & Waugh, P. (1996). Modern Literary Theory: A Reader (3rd ed). London: Arnold.

Saussure, F. d. (1960). Course in General Linguistics (Wade Baskin, Trans.). London: Fontana.

Sexton, A. (2003). On Joyce’s Dubliners. New York: Wiley Publishing, Inc.

Scholes, R. (1975). Structuralism in Literature: An Introduction. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Scholes, R. (1979). Elements of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scholes, R. (1982). Semiotic Approaches to Joyce’s ‘Eveline’. In Semiotics and Interpretation (pp. 87-109). Yale: Yale University Press.

Scholes, R., & Walzl, F. L. (1967). The Epiphanies of Joyce. PMLA, 82(1), 152-154.

Smith, G. B. (1996). Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the Transition to Postmodernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Walzl, F. L. (1965). The Liturgy of the Epiphany Season and the Epiphanies of Joyce. PMLA, 80(4), 436-440.

Waugh, P. (1992). Practicing Postmodernism, Reading Modernism. London: Edward Arnold.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.sll.1923156320120502.1926

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com