Event Models: A Socio-cognitive Study of Selected Interrogations in 2008 Quasi-judicial Public Hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration in Nigeria

Unuabonah Foluke

Abstract


This study carries out a socio-cognitive analysis of 2008 national quasi-judicial public hearing on Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Nigeria. Video recordings of interrogations between the public hearing panel and complainants/defendants were used as data for the study, which were taken from the 2008 national public hearings on FCT administration in Nigeria. Van Dijk’s socio­cognitive approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used in the analysis of the data. Twenty randomly sampled interrogations were recorded and transcribed. The event models of the interactants featured global topics and local semantics, argumentative and rhetorical strategies. These are influenced by protective, suppressive, defensive and restorative ideologies. The study helps in the understanding of public hearing interrogations as it gives one the knowledge of how ideologies can shape linguistic and semantic patterns in a text.

Key words: Critical discourse analysis; Sociocognitive; Ideologies; Event models; Quasi-judicial Public Hearing


Keywords


Critical discourse analysis; Sociocognitive; Ideologies; Event models; Quasi-judicial Public Hearing

References


Anthonissen, C. (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis as an Analytic Tool in Considering Selected, Prominent Features of TRC Testimonies. Journal of Language and Politics, 5(1), 171-196.
Bock, Z. (2008). ‘Language Has a Heart’: Linguistic Markers of Evaluation in Selected TRC Testimonies. Language of Multicultural Discourses, 3(3), 189-203.
Brasher, H. (2006). Listening to Hearings: Legislative Hearings and Legislative Outcomes. American Politics Research, 34, 583-604.
Duffin, D.L. (2003). Explaining Participation in Congressional Oversight Hearings. American Politics Research, 31, 455-484.
Headrick, B., Serra, G., & Twombly, J. (2002). Enforcement and Oversight: Using Congressional Oversight to Shape OSHA Bureaucratic Behavior. American Politics Research, 30, 608-629.
Lubbe, H. J. (2007). Comparative Analysis of the Reportage of the Guguletu 7 Events in the South African Press in 1986 and 1997. Critical Arts, 21(1), 152-165.
Makinde, B. (2008). Must We Kill el-Rufai Now? Nigerian Tribune, April 18.
McCormick, K., & Bock, M. (1999). Narratives of the TRC: Towards a Framework for Analysis [Pdf Version]. Retrieved from http://www.pala.ac.uk/resources/proceedings/1999/ pdf/bockmc.html.
Meinig, B. (1998). Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them[MRSC publications]. Retrieved from http://www. mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspx.
Ross, F. (2006). Linguistic Bearings and Testimonial Practices. In C. Anthoniseen, & J. Blommaert (Eds), Critical Linguistic Perspectives on Coping with Traumatic Pasts: Case Studies (pp. 111-124). London: John Benjamin Publishing.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1991). Racism and the Press. In R. Miles (Ed), Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. New York: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2001a). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.354-371). United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001b). Discourse, Ideology and Context. Folia Linguistica, XXX/1-2, 11-40.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2002). Political Discourse and Political Cognition. In P. A. Chilton, & Christina. (Ed), Politics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse (pp. 204-236). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, Context and Cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177.
Verdoolaege, A. (2003). Would You be Prepared to Reconcile, Please?The Discursive Introduction of Reconciliation at the Human Rights Violations Hearings of the TRC. Retrieved from http://www.TRCresearchwebsite.html.
Verdoolaege, A. (2009). The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 441-463.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.sll.1923156320110301.300

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture
Address: 758, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net
Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com