The Criminal Law Solution of Foreigners Committing Crimes Within National States Territory: Take Chinese Criminal Law as An Example

Shan CHEN

Abstract


In the era of globalization, foreigners committed crimes in the national territory are mainly subject to the sovereignty governance mode. The national penalty power is not the same to the nationals and the foreigners. Penalty to the nationals aims to confirm self-decision will of the community social contract, and obtain the basic conditions of returning to national community law and order; penalty to foreigners committed crimes within the territory aims to confirm self-decision will of participating in social life and signing the “residential contract”; and whether allow him to return to territorial social life depends on the judgment of his “contracting will” and “performance capabilities”. National penalty justice is the legitimate criminal law value applied under the sovereignty governance, and it should maintain consistency to global penalty justice to achieve a “negotiated justice”.


Keywords


Foreigner; Territorial crime; Sovereignty governance; National penalty justice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Iwamura Shuji (1994). The criminal status of foreigners in major European countries. Modern Foreign Philosophy and Social Science Digest, (9).

Wang, H. Y. (2009). The serious situation of foreigners committing crimes in Russia. Legal Information, (6), 2009.

Rui, M. (2012, February 16). 17.3% robbers are foreigners, the French immigration security becomes the focus of the election. European Times (Chinese Edition).

Anonymous (2013, November 13). Referendum-Swiss cannot tolerate foreign criminals. http://www.swissinfo.ch/chi/detail/content.html?cid=28895016.

Yu Zhigang (2012). Solution of criminal law to foreigners committing crimes in China. China Social land Sciences, (6).

Yu, K. P. (2001). Introduction to global governance. globalization: Global governance (p.13). Social Sciences Academic Press.

Hsu Nai-Man (2006). Criminal law in globalization. In K. S. Zheng (Ed.), Devotion to law and justice-Criminal Law Professor HsuNai-Man paper selections. Tai Pei spring-sun Forum, pp.185-197, 2006.

Thorsten Sellin (1938, Jul.). Culture conflict and crime. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1).

Fire, Kill, & Rob (2013, June 7). Garner savage catch Chinese. Qingdao Daily.

Anonymous (2013, July 21). Nearly 500 foreign prisoners are imprisoned in Dongguan, including Putin’a alumni. Jing Bao.

Garofalo (1996). Criminology (p.406). W. Geng (Trans.). Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.

Michelle Mann (2003). Whether globalization ends national states. In K. P. Yu (Ed.), Globalization: Global governance (p.143). Social Science Paper Publishing.

JacoJacobs (2001). Specification, Personality, Social (p.100). Law Press.

Pavlik (2011). Personality, Subject, Citizens (p.79). People’s University of China Press.

Wang, X. M. (2012, May 15). Chinese Judicial Has Jurisdiction over the Principle Offender of Mekong River Tragedy. Law Weekend.

Ji, Shuangcheng,Tao Duanfang (2010, January 1). World controversy on abolition of death penalty over two centuries. Global Times.

He, B. G. (2004). Three concepts of global justice: Criticism of local justice over global justice. In Xu, J. L. (Ed.), Dialogue between global justice and civilizations (pp.71-81). Jiangsu People’s Publishing.

Chen, Z. L. (1998). Understanding, application and improvement of the principle of territoriality. Modern Law, (5).

Li, H. Y. (2003). Discussion on the criminal jurisdiction of coastal states over foreign ships in territorial sea. Peking University International law and Comparative Law Review, Series 2.

Gao, M. X., & Ma, K. C. (2011). Criminal law (p.328). Peking University Press, High Education Press.

Nishida Norino (2007). General provisions of Japanese criminal law (p.334, M. X. Liu, & Z. W. Wang Eds.). China People’s University Press. [Japan]

Yang, X. P., & He, P. (2001). Whether non-special identity person can constitute complicity of crime of corruption. Law, (12).

Gao, M. X. (1993). Criminal law principles (Vol. II, pp.33-38). China People’s University Press.

Xie, W. Y., Liu, Z. W. (2003). Illegitimate recognition of establishment of crime. Law Review, (3).

Otsuka Ren (2003). Criminal law in general (p.106). J. Feng (Trans.). China People’s University Press.

Feng, J. (1996). Criminal responsibility (p.208). Law Press.

Feng, Y. D. (2006). Illegality cognition and recognition of criminal law. Law Research, (3), 2006.

Ma, K. C. (2003). Comparative criminal law principle (p.489). Wuhan University Press.

Du, M. (2013). Problems of application of penalties to foreign criminals. Chinese Prosecutors, (8), 2013.

Zhou, Y. K. (2013). Death penalty shall be applied to foreigners. http://blog.caijing.com.cn, July 9, 2013.

Liu, Y. J. (2007). Whether deprivation of political rights shall be applied to foreigner’s criminals. Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute, (5).

Ma, K> C. (2002). General theory of penalty (p.462). Wuhan University Press.

Guo, S. (2012). The new powers’ issues: Research of judicial solutions over illegal immigrants in China. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (5), 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.css.1923669720141001.3943

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; css@cscanada.net; css@cscanada.org

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture

Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138

Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

E-mail:css@cscanada.net, css@cscanada.org