Romanticism Debated

Halla Shureteh

Abstract


Arthur Lovejoy, the influential American philosopher, argues that the word Romanticism “offers one of the most complicated, fascinating, and instructive of all problems in semantics.” This is because we have many paradoxical varieties and definitions of Romanticism. This paper discusses some key perspectives of Romanticism during the twentieth century, incorporating Arthur Lovejoy, Rene Wellek and Morse Peckham. It calls attention to their critical and conceptual perceptions of Romanticism and holds them as particularly the most important and, perhaps, the most realistic assessments of Romanticism in the history of the literary theory. Through the perceptions of those three scholars, the paper discusses the various and truly paradoxical interpretations of Romanticism and concludes by saying that the difficulties of having a multitude of incongruent assessments of Romanticism explains why we do not have a theory that speaks of a Romanticism with a unified and precise nature and not of a plurality of truly paradoxical romanticisms. Indeed, those paradoxical and many interpretations render the very concept of Romanticism impossible to define up to this day.


Keywords


Romanticism; Romanticisms; Theory of romanticism; Arthur Lovejoy; Rene Wellek; Morse Peckham

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gingerich, S. F. (1924). Essays in the romantic poets. New York: Macmillan.

Hearn, J. (1970). The English romantic poets. Folcroft Library Editions.

Kumar, S. K. (1966). British romantic poets: Recent evaluations. New York: New York University Press.

Lovejoy, A. O. (1924). On the discrimination of Romanticisms. In M. H. Abrams (Ed.), English romantic poets: Modern essays in criticism. (1960). New York: Oxford University Press.

McDonald, C. (Ed.). (1985). The ear of the other: Texts and discussions with Jacques Derrida (P. Kamuf Trans.). Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

Peckham, M. (1966). Toward a theory of Romanticism. In S. Kumar (Ed.), British romantic poets: Recent evaluations. New York: New York University Press.

Watson, J. R. (1992). English poetry of the romantic period, 1789-1830. London and New York: Longman.

Wellek, R. (1973). Romanticism re-examined. In G. Stephen & Jr. Nicholas (Ed.), Concepts of criticism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Wellek, R. (1973). The concept of Romanticism in literary history. In S. G. Jr. Nicholas (Ed.), Concepts of criticism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968%2Fj.css.1923669720130904.2524

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Reminder

If you have already registered in Journal A and plan to submit article(s) to Journal B, please click the CATEGORIES, or JOURNALS A-Z on the right side of the "HOME".


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; css@cscanada.net; css@cscanada.org

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture

Address: 730, 77e AV, Laval, Quebec, H7V 4A8, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138

Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

E-mail:css@cscanada.net, css@cscanada.org