From “Governance” to “Non-Intervention”: An Ecological Interpretation of “Reversal is the Movement of the Dao” in Through the Arc of the Rain Forest
Abstract
The current world ecological crisis is rooted in the logic of “human governance” dominated by the Western linear developmentalism,which is objectifying nature and controlling it through technological interventions. Academics believe that such logic can be traced back to Western Christian anthropocentrism, and the tragedy of Matacao rainforest development presented by Karen Yamashita in Through the Arc of the Rain Forest profoundly reveals the ecological evils of such linear thinking: the colonizers’forced transformation of the rainforest ecosystem through “progressive” initiatives such as road construction and resource extraction, which eventually led to the spread of plague and cultural collapse, is a perfect illustration of the ancient warning of “Acting rashly leads to misfortune(Chapter 16 of the Tao Te Ching)”, that human-induced changes to the natural process will ultimately result in a reversal of the consequences. Although the idea of “Deep Ecology” put forward by Arne Naess in 1973 criticized anthropocentrism, it has not yet transcended the linear logic of “human management of nature” and is unable to solve the problem at all. In the novel, the tenacious vitality of the rainforest system for self-repair,the survival wisdom of the aboriginal people of “adapting to the natural cycle and retreating at the right time,” and Kazumasa Ishimaru’s eventual choice of “returning to the nature” exactly echoes the Taoist cycle philosophy of “Reversal is the movement of the Dao (Chapter 40 of Tao Te Ching)”, which points out the fundamental way out of today’s ecological governance with the wisdom of cyclicity, transformation of opposites, and reversal to the roots. The core revelation is that ecological governance does not lie in more powerful technological interventions, but rather in the way of returning of “Attain utmost emptiness;preserve deepest stillness (Chapter 16 of Tao Te Ching)”------recognizing the subjective status of nature, respecting its ability to self-regulate, and not going against what nature has done. The way to solve the contemporary ecological crisis may lie in the reverse thought of this millennium classic.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, R., & Zhang, X. (2025). The construction of ecological thoughts repository in ancient Chinese philosophy. Research and Commentary on Humanities and Arts, 3 (3).
Čiubrinskas, V., & Schiller, N. G. (2025). Transnationalities of migrant moral economies in a transforming world. Berghahn Books.
Department of History & Philosophy, Virginia State University. (2020). The self in deep ecology: A response to Watson. Asian Philosophy, 30 (1), 30-39.
Frantz, P., Rego, F., & Barbas, S. (2025). Ecocentrism vs. anthropocentrism: To the core of the dilemma to overcome it. In The Linacre quarterly (pp. 00243639251339844).
Knežić, I., Poljak, M., & Palić, D. (2024). Descartes’ mathematical method and the problem of cognition of the material world. Acta Iadertina, 21 (1), 109-132.
Laozi. (2016). Tao te ching (J. Legge, Trans.). Zhongzhou Ancient Books Press.
Liu, P. (2024). Laozi’s ecofeminist ethos: Bridging ancient wisdom with contemporary gender and environmental justice. Religions, 15 (5).
Marland, P. (2013). Ecocriticism. Literature Compass, 10 (11), 846-868.
Michael, T. (2023). Laozi’s conception of justice in the Daodejing: Distinguishing the constant Dao from the Dao of Heaven. Religions, 14 (6).
Michael, T. (2024). The philosophy of time in the Daodejing: From the perspective of Heshang Gong’s Huang-Lao Daoism. Dao, 24 (1), 1-21.
Shuttleworth, K. M. J. (2025). Beyond anthropocentrism: A Watsujian ecological ethic. Asian Philosophy, 35 (1), 29-44.
Stettler, M. J. (2024).Spiritual exercises and early modern philosophy: Bacon, Descartes, Spinozaby Simone D’Agostino. Metaphilosophy, 55 (2), 280-282.
Svensson, F. (2024). Descartes’s moral perfectionism. Taylor & Francis.
Tamura, A. (2025). Experientiaand conscientia: Two ambiguous concepts in Descartes’s metaphysics. The European Legacy, 30 (5), 578-590.
Wang, Y. (2025). Ziranand continuous orderly transformation: New interpretation of Ziranin Daodejing. Religions, 16 (7), 902.
White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155 (3767), 1203-1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
Yamashita, K. T. (2017). Through the arc of the rain forest. Coffee House Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/13848
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Canadian Social Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture