Liberal Ideology and Its Claim of Final Form of Human Government: Explaining the Challenges Facing the Liberal Ideology
Abstract
This article interrogates liberal ideology and its claim of final form of human government. The political corollary of liberal ideology is hinged on the premise of democratic ethos and notably multiparty, constitutionalism, transparency and accountability, free, fair and periodic elections and above all upholding the rule of law. Using the qualitative method approach, liberal ideology can satisfy humanity's deepest desires and has no fundamental contradictions. Its triumph has signaled the end of the protracted historical conflict that had previously prevented its growth. Because it fit the current way of thinking, liberalism received extensive prominence in the western press and academic community. Liberal ideas have been internally split and sidetracked by both important and trivial concerns for the past few years. This study explained that while liberalism and democracy usually go together, they can be separated in theory. A country can be liberal without being democratic. Britain experienced it in the eighteenth – century. A country can also be democratic without being liberal, that is without protecting the rights of individual citizens and minority citizens of the country. The study notes that the economic strand of liberalism focuses on trade. The argument of the liberal is that, trade is important, not because it prevents states from going to war, but because it may lead states to define their interests in a way that makes war less important to them. This paper, however, argues that despite the challenges of liberal ideology, Liberalism recognizes the right of free economic activity and economic exchange based on private property and markets. Since the term capitalism has acquired so many pejorative connotations over the years, it has recently become a fashion to speak of “free market economies” instead; both are acceptable alternative terms for economic liberalism.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Clinton, W. J. (1997). Acheson Dean: A Life in the Cold War. Second Inaugural Address. Oxford University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History. The National Interest (Summer).
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and Last Man. New York, Oxford University Press.
Gaoel, M. (2003). The Clash of Civilizations and Radicalism. National Interest (Summer).
Gauba, O. (2003). An Introduction to Political Theory. Fourth Edition. Rajiv Beri for Macmillan Indian Press.
Huntington, S (2011). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Kagan, R (2009). The Return of History and The End of Dreams. Vintage Books, New York.
Keohane, R & Nye, J (2011).Power and Interdependence. Longman Publishers, New York.
Lievonon, M. (2013). Understanding Google algorithms and SEO is essential for online marketer: Guide for interns in Golden Moments [Unpublished Masters Thesis]. Tampere University of Applied Sciences.
Macnamara, J. (2005). Media Content Analysis: Its uses, Benefits and Best Practice Methodology. Asian Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34. https://opus.lib. uts.edu.au/handle/10453/10102
Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications.
Nye, J (2009). Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History. Longman Publishers, New York.
Nye, J (2011). The Future of Power. Public Affairs Publishers, New York.
Nye, J. & David, W. (2011).Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to Theory and History. Longman Publishers, New York.
Riffe, D., & Freitag, A. (1997). A content analysis of content analyses: Twenty-five years of journalism quarterly. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400414.
Tarisayi, S. K., & Manik, S. (2020). An Unabating Challenge: Media Portrayal of Xenophobia in South Africa. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 7(1).
Tuli, F. (2010). The Basis of Distinction between Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Social Science: Reflection on Ontological, Epistemological and methodological Perspective. Ethiop Journal of Education and Science, 6(1), 101-102.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/13787
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Canadian Social Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science
We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net,or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture